Best Practices of eTherapy
Clarifying the Definition of e-Therapy
John M. Grohol, Psy.D.
May 2, 2001
Sadly, some people still don't get what it is about online
therapy (or e-therapy) that makes it special.
What It Is
Online therapy is a new type of psychotherapy, it is simply
not psychotherapy transplanted online no more than telephone interventions
are simply psychotherapy transplanted to the telephone, crisis intervention
is psychotherapy done quickly, or play therapy is psychotherapy done
with toys. This is an extremely simplistic point of view which
minimizes the richness and differences associated with this
new medium, and the unique characteristics that accompany it.
Online therapy uses the richness of language to
help bring about change in the client's life. Language, whether it
be written or oral, is the core component of communication. While
some might suggest that communication is best achieved via spoken
dialogue only (and indeed, suggest that psychotherapy can only be
conducted via the spoken word), there is little empirical evidence
to back up such a supposition. In order for psychotherapy to be
effective (no matter what its type), communication needs to occur
and a relationship between the client and therapist must be established.
Nothing about online therapy makes these two components any more
difficult to achieve. Nor does their achievement come at a cost
in terms of quality or understanding.
Online therapy reaches out to the majority of people who would
never seek professional mental health services. Traditional
psychotherapy, as a general means of change available to nearly
anybody (as envisioned by the late President Kennedy via his
initiation of the community mental health center system), has
largely failed. The U.S. Surgeon General's Report on Mental
Health in 1999 showed that the majority of people who have
diagosable mental disorders do not presently seek out or obtain
professional treatment. This despite the huge treatment advances
made in the past decade to help cure many mental disorders within
a few months. Online therapy offers a valuable new modality
to reach out to a larger group of people concerned about
issues of confidentiality and privacy.
Online therapy is potentially more secure, confidential, and
private than traditional face-to-face therapy. Because of
the unique qualities of the e-therapy, therapeutic change can
take place in an anonymous or pseudonymous context. This provides
a level of security and confidentiality that cannot be matched
in the real world. I've worked in clinics where confidentiality
was regularly breached because of thin walls, open doors, files
sitting on doctor's and therapist's desks while they went on a
break or to lunch, entire filing rooms gone unlocked and unmonitored,
and the continuing breach of a client's privacy by third parties,
such as insurance companies. For online therapy, you don't have
to worry about any of these regular breaches of your privacy,
especially since online therapy doesn't require personally
identifying information in order to work. After all, therapy
is about fostering change in people, not demographics.
Online therapy can be a more powerful, quicker change agent
than traditional psychotherapy. As others, such as King & Suler,
have pointed out, the online modality pulls for greater projection
and psychodynamic characteristics which often enhance the power
of the therapy. Also, as has been well written about and documented,
people in online therapy tend to get to the point more quickly
and do not spend sessions wasting time talking about issues
of little relevance to the reasons that brought them into
therapy. In traditional face-to-face therapy relationships,
entire sessions can be spent discussing issues that have no
impact on the person's actual diagnosis or disorder. A great
deal of a professional's time can also be spent on non-therapy
issues, such as payment, rescheduling appointments, tedious
record-keeping on paper forms, and "shooting the breeze."
While some of this also takes places in online therapy, it
does so to a much lesser extent and to a much smaller overall
percentage than in face-to-face therapy.
What It Is Not
Online therapy is not illegal, when practiced thoughtfully
and with careful consideration of the issues. Some non-lawyers
have made outright, outrageous claims about the legality of
online therapy, when in fact, there is not a single state within
the United States (or, for that matter, a single country within
the world) that has specifically addressed the issue of online
therapy regulation through law or a court decision. Nor has there
been a single court decision in any state or country (to date)
addressing the jurisdictional issues of the practice. Professionals
who make well-intentioned claims about the illegality of online
therapy are misleading professionals and the lay public. Since
online therapy is not psychotherapy (no more than occupational
therapy is considered psychotherapy), psychotherapy laws do not
obviously or automatically apply. This issue may be decided some
day, but as of now, e-therapy is a legitimate form of professional
help.
Online therapy is not inherently "distance therapy". Since
two people involved in e-therapy can be sitting in the same
room together, it is a misnomer to try and classify it as
"distance therapy." Nothing about online therapy suggests
that it needs to be done at a distance, or that it is most
effective at a distance.
Online therapy is not without research backing its use.
Some professionals are claiming there are little or no studies
out there that support online therapy's effectiveness or use.
Many studies are indeed single case studies or research presented
at professional conferences (not in peer-reviewed journals).
This is a fairly typical pattern for new treatments making
their way through academia circles, starting with the lowest
and easiest studies to conduct, and gradually moving to
larger, more complex, and better funded studies.
For instance, in a study presented at
a professional eating disorder conference in the U.K. last
year, investigators showed that using online therapy
is more effective than no treatment at all or a support group.
But because this study was never published, few are aware of
it.
Online therapy is not a cure-all or answer to everyone's
problems. Nor has anyone ever suggested it should be. This
straw-man argument is sometimes raised in the context of
online therapy "stealing" clients away from traditional
face-to-face therapy. In fact, e-therapy is much more
likely to increase traditional psychotherapy services
because of its outreach to the population of people who
would never even consider going to see a therapist
face-to-face might try one online. Used as an adjunct
to ongoing face-to-face therapy, or when therapy is
terminated or the client moves away, it can be a very
helpful modality to many people in many different ways.
It is no more a "one shoe fits all" approach than face-to-face
psychotherapy.
For more information about e-therapy, I suggest reading
the other essays in the Best Practices in e-Therapy series.
Last reviewed:
By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on
1 Aug 2011
Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.
Understanding is the soil in which grow all the fruits of friendship.
-- Woodrow Wilson