Home » News » Reading Skills in Adolescence Help Explain Gender Gap in Higher Education

Reading Skills in Adolescence Help Explain Gender Gap in Higher Education

A new study may shed light on why, in most developed nations, fewer men than women tend to enroll in higher education or other types of post-high school education.

After looking at data from 18 nations, a research team from the University of Missouri and the University of Essex in the U.K. found these gender disparities may be due to girls’ stronger reading skills in the teen years combined with changes in social attitudes about women attending college.

According to the researchers, these gender differences in higher education have the potential for long-term disruptions in social cohesion and economic development.

“Reading scores are important for both boys and girls, and we know that girls, on average, score better on reading tests,” said co-author David Geary, a Curators Distinguished Professor of Psychological Sciences in the College of Arts and Science at the University of Missouri.

Geary adds that adolescent reading scores as well as social attitudes toward women attending college can predict the ratio of men and women attending college or other post-secondary education.

“Here, we studied a snapshot of reading achievements for boys and girls when they were 15 years old,” he said. “And with an understanding of how social attitudes are in various countries about girls going to college, we can predict the ratio of men and women attending college five years later.”

Geary and his co-author Gijsbert Stoet, a professor of psychology at University of Essex, analyzed three international databases: post-secondary education enrollment data between 2011-2017 from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development; national reading scores for 15- and 16-year-olds from the Program for International Student Assessment; and social attitudes toward women pursuing university education from the World Values Survey.

Specifically, the researchers looked at one question in the World Values Survey that read, “A university education is more important for a boy than for a girl.” In total, the data represents over 400,000 boys and girls in 18 countries.

Stoet explains why social attitudes should be considered along with reading scores.

“An important factor to consider is the degree to which people across the world believe that a college education is equally important for girls as it is for boys,” Stoet said. “Although more and more girls have been going to college, girls are still more likely than boys to be at a disadvantage in terms of social attitudes; this is a bigger problem in some countries than in others.”

Geary said the study paints a bleak picture for reducing this gender gap — unless reading skills are improved. “The practical implication is that equity in college enrollment is well out of reach at this time,” Geary said.

“There is no good reason to expect that national reading levels for either gender will be sufficiently raised in the coming decade to change enrollment patterns. The way to counter that is to improve reading skills, but that improvement will have to start early in life. The reading gap between boys and girls is there from the very beginning of schooling, even in preschool,” he said.

The study “Gender Differences in the Pathways to Higher Education” is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Source: University of Missouri-Columbia


Reading Skills in Adolescence Help Explain Gender Gap in Higher Education

Traci Pedersen

Traci Pedersen is a professional writer with over a decade of experience. Her work consists of writing for both print and online publishers in a variety of genres including science chapter books, college and career articles, and elementary school curriculum.

APA Reference
Pedersen, T. (2020). Reading Skills in Adolescence Help Explain Gender Gap in Higher Education. Psych Central. Retrieved on December 5, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 10 Jun 2020 (Originally: 10 Jun 2020)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 10 Jun 2020
Published on Psych All rights reserved.