MIT researchers have discovered a strong relationship between students’ grades and how much sleep they get. Furthermore, the time a student goes to bed and the consistency of their sleep habits also make a big difference.
Interestingly, getting a good night’s sleep just before a big test is not good enough — it takes several nights in a row of good sleep to make a difference.
MIT researchers studied 100 students in an engineering class. The students were given Fitbits to track their activity over the course of a semester. The findings — some unsurprising, but some quite unexpected — appear in the journal Science of Learning.
The research was performed by MIT postdoc Dr. Kana Okano, professors Jeffrey Grossman and John Gabrieli, and two others.
One of the surprises was that individuals who went to bed after some particular threshold time — for these students, that tended to be 2 a.m., but it varied from one person to another — tended to perform less well on their tests no matter how much total sleep they ended up getting.
Uniquely, the study did not begin as research on sleep. Instead, Grossman was trying to find a correlation between physical exercise and the academic performance of students in his class Introduction to Solid-State Chemistry. In addition to having 100 of the students wear Fitbits for the semester, he also enrolled about one-fourth of them in an intense fitness class created specifically for this study.
The thinking was that there might be measurable differences in test performance between the two groups. There wasn’t. Those without the fitness classes performed just as well as those who did take them.
“What we found at the end of the day was zero correlation with fitness, which I must say was disappointing since I believed, and still believe, there is a tremendous positive impact of exercise on cognitive performance,” Grossman said.
He speculates that the intervals between the fitness program and the classes may have been too long to show an effect. But meanwhile, in the vast amount of data collected during the semester, some other correlations did become obvious.
While the devices weren’t explicitly monitoring sleep, the Fitbit program’s proprietary algorithms did detect periods of sleep and changes in sleep quality, primarily based on lack of activity.
These correlations were not at all subtle, Grossman said. There was essentially a straight-line relationship between the average amount of sleep a student got and their grades on the 11 quizzes, three midterms, and final exam, with the grades ranging from A’s to C’s.
“There’s lots of scatter, it’s a noisy plot, but it’s a straight line,” he said. The fact that there was a correlation between sleep and performance wasn’t surprising, but the extent of it was, he said. Of course, this correlation can’t absolutely prove that sleep was the determining factor in the students’ performance, as opposed to some other influence that might have affected both sleep and grades. But the results are a strong indication, Grossman said, that sleep “really, really matters.”
“Of course, we knew already that more sleep would be beneficial to classroom performance, from a number of previous studies that relied on subjective measures like self-report surveys,” Grossman said. “But in this study the benefits of sleep are correlated to performance in the context of a real-life college course, and driven by large amounts of objective data collection.”
The study also revealed no improvement in scores for those who made sure to get a good night’s sleep right before a big test.
According to the data, “the night before doesn’t matter,” Grossman said. “We’ve heard the phrase ‘Get a good night’s sleep, you’ve got a big day tomorrow.’ It turns out this does not correlate at all with test performance. Instead, it’s the sleep you get during the days when learning is happening that matter most.”
Another surprising finding is that there appears to be a certain cutoff for bedtimes, such that going to bed later results in poorer performance, even if the total amount of sleep is the same.
“When you go to bed matters,” Grossman said. “If you get a certain amount of sleep — let’s say seven hours — no matter when you get that sleep, as long as it’s before certain times, say you go to bed at 10, or at 12, or at 1, your performance is the same. But if you go to bed after 2, your performance starts to go down even if you get the same seven hours. So, quantity isn’t everything.”
Quality of sleep also mattered, not just quantity. For example, those who got relatively consistent amounts of sleep each night did better than those who had greater variations from one night to the next, even if they ended up with the same average amount.
This research also helped to provide an explanation for something that Grossman says he had noticed and wondered about for years, which is that on average, the women in his class have consistently gotten better grades than the men.
Now, he has a possible answer: The data show that the differences in quantity and quality of sleep can fully account for the differences in grades. “If we correct for sleep, men and women do the same in class. So sleep could be the explanation for the gender difference in our class,” he said.
More research will be needed to understand the reasons why women tend to have better sleep habits than men. “There are so many factors out there that it could be,” Grossman said. “I can envision a lot of exciting follow-on studies to try to understand this result more deeply.”