Home » News » Routine Sparring in Boxing Tied to Short-Term Cognitive Problems

Routine Sparring in Boxing Tied to Short-Term Cognitive Problems

Routine sparring in boxing can lead to short-term impairments in brain-to-muscle communication and decreased memory performance, according to a new study from the University of Stirling in Scotland.

The researchers evaluated boxers before and after a nine-minute sparring session in which the athletes traded punches without the aim of incapacitating each other.

This study, alongside the team’s 2016 research into the impact of heading footballs (soccer balls), is one of the first to show that routine impact in sport — thought to be relatively safe — can result in measurable changes in the brain.

“For many years, a debate has taken place around the safety of boxing, however, these discussions often focus on heavy blows inflicted during competitive fights,” said Dr. Thomas Di Virgilio, who led the study with colleagues from the Stirling Brains multidisciplinary research team. “In contrast, we looked at subconcussive impacts — those that are below the concussion threshold — inflicted during training sessions.”

Experts believe the findings raise further questions around the safety of other sports, where similar routine impacts occur, and say more research is required.

“There are still questions surrounding the relationship between repetitive routine head impacts — such as heading in football or sparring in boxing — and brain health. The truth is that we do not currently know how much impact is safe,” said Di Virgilio.

“Our findings are important because they show that routine practices may have immediate effects on the brain. Furthermore, athletes may be at greater risk of injury if the communications between the brain and muscles are impaired.”

For the study, the team assessed the motor control and cognitive function of 20 boxers and Muay Thai (Thai boxing) athletes before and after a nine-minute sparring session (three rounds of three minutes). Measurements were taken immediately after the session, and then one-hour and 24 hours later.

Motor control was measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation — which uses magnetic fields to stimulate the nerve cells in the brains of participants — to understand how it communicates with the muscles.

The participants also completed a series of tests which provided objective measures of cognitive function.

The findings reveal that, one hour after sparring, the participants showed impaired brain-to-muscle communications and reduced memory performance, compared to controls. After 24 hours, these effects returned to baseline.

“We have previously shown that the repetitive heading of footballs results in short-term changes to brain function and this latest study sought to understand whether similar effects were observed in training practices in other sports. Although transient, we found that brain changes observed after sparring are reminiscent of effects seen following brain injury,” said Di Virgilio.

“As with our previous research into heading footballs, it is not possible to say whether there is a ‘safe’ threshold when it comes to the level of impact in sparring. Further research is required to help sportspeople — and the academic community — fully understand the dangers posed by subconcussive impacts, routine in sport, and any measures that can be taken to mitigate against these risks.”

The findings are published in the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Source: University of Stirling


Routine Sparring in Boxing Tied to Short-Term Cognitive Problems

Traci Pedersen

Traci Pedersen is a professional writer with over a decade of experience. Her work consists of writing for both print and online publishers in a variety of genres including science chapter books, college and career articles, and elementary school curriculum.

APA Reference
Pedersen, T. (2019). Routine Sparring in Boxing Tied to Short-Term Cognitive Problems. Psych Central. Retrieved on September 27, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 14 Sep 2019 (Originally: 14 Sep 2019)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 14 Sep 2019
Published on Psych All rights reserved.