advertisement
Home » News » Social Media May Have Impacted Elections Less Than Believed
Social Media May Have Impacted Elections Less Than Believed

Social Media May Have Impacted Elections Less Than Believed

Social media had only a small influence on how much people believed falsehoods about candidates and issues in the last two presidential elections, according to a pair of new national studies.

And Facebook — which came under fire for spreading misinformation in the 2016 campaign — actually reduced misperceptions by users in that election compared to those who consumed only other social media, said a researcher at Ohio State University.

The results suggest we need to put the dangers of social media spreading misinformation in perspective, said Dr. R. Kelly Garrett, author of the study and a professor of communication at the university.

In previous research, Garrett found evidence suggesting that email contributed to the spread of false information in the 2008 election, before social media was as popular as it is today.

Garrett explained he specifically designed these studies to gauge the role of social media in what Americans believed in the last two election campaigns.

Reliance on social media for political news has increased rapidly, he noted. In 2012, about two in five Americans reported using social media for political purposes, according to the Pew Research Center.

In 2016, more Americans named Facebook as the source they used for pre-election political information than any other site, including those of major news organizations, the new study found.

“This study began long before ‘fake news’ became as popular a topic as it is today. But the questions that drive this study are very much in keeping with our concerns about how disinformation is spread online,” Garrett said.

During both the 2012 and 2016 elections, groups of more than 600 Americans filled out surveys online three times, indicating their social media use at each point, as well as their beliefs in confirmed falsehoods.

The 2012 study involved misperceptions about the two presidential candidates, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney. Participants rated on a five-point scale how much they agreed with eight falsehoods, including “Barack Obama is Muslim, not Christian” and “As governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney signed a health care law providing taxpayer-funded abortions.”

Overall, Republicans tended to hold less accurate beliefs about President Obama than Democrats, while Democrats held less accurate beliefs about Romney than Republicans, according to the study’s findings.

The findings also showed that increasing social media use reduced participants’ belief accuracy about Obama falsehoods, although the effect was small.

In the most extreme case, someone using social media to get political information could have an accuracy score concerning Obama falsehoods almost half a point lower on the five-point scale than someone who did not use social media at all, the researcher reported.

Social media use did not influence belief in the Romney falsehoods, Garrett said. One important reason may be that the rumors about Romney were much less known than those about Obama, he said.

The 2016 study focused on false beliefs about four campaign issues: Repealing the Affordable Care Act would reduce the national debt; most Muslims support violence against Western countries, including the U.S.; immigrants are more likely to commit violent crimes than individuals born in the U.S.; and human activity has no influence on global climate.

After considering more than a dozen potential issues, Garrett said he selected these four because they were referenced most frequently on the campaign trail and received extensive media coverage, and because of evidence that Americans were at least occasionally mistaken about them.

Results showed that, overall, Republicans beliefs tended to be less accurate than those of Democrats, which made sense because the falsehoods were a prominent part of the Republican campaign strategy, Garrett said.

Participants with higher levels of education held more accurate beliefs, he added.

Unlike in 2012, participants in 2016 were asked which social media platforms they used during each of the three waves of the study.

Facebook was the most popular social media platform for following news among study participants, followed by YouTube and Twitter.

The study discovered that overall, social media use was not related to participants’ belief accuracy on the four issues.

But the influence of using social media was different for people who used Facebook than for people who only used other platforms. Among the heaviest social media users, those who used Facebook were about a half point more accurate on the five-point scale, on average, than those who didn’t, according to the study’s findings.

“It is not a huge difference, but it does call into question the conventional wisdom that Facebook had an especially harmful influence on campaign issue beliefs,” Garrett said.

The study was published in the journal PLOS ONE.

Source: Ohio State University

Social Media May Have Impacted Elections Less Than Believed

Janice Wood

Janice Wood is a long-time writer and editor who began working at a daily newspaper before graduating from college. She has worked at a variety of newspapers, magazines and websites, covering everything from aviation to finance to healthcare.

APA Reference
Wood, J. (2019). Social Media May Have Impacted Elections Less Than Believed. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 12, 2019, from https://psychcentral.com/news/2019/03/30/social-media-may-have-impacted-elections-less-than-believed/144185.html
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 30 Mar 2019
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 30 Mar 2019
Published on Psych Central.com. All rights reserved.