Home » News » Alzheimer’s Research Targets Variants of Sticky Brain Proteins
Alzheimer's Research Targets Variants of Sticky Brain Proteins

Alzheimer’s Research Targets Variants of Sticky Brain Proteins

Emerging research has discovered that not all forms of amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein, the protein thought to initiate Alzheimer’s disease, contribute equally to the progress of the disease.

In two new studies, investigators from Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston  developed a new way of preparing and extracting the protein as well as a new technique to search for promising drug candidates.

Researchers explain that the new approach highlights the importance of testing and targeting different forms of Aβ. The findings may help advance the search for more precise and effective drugs to prevent or halt the progress of Alzheimer’s disease.

“Many different efforts are currently underway to find treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, and anti-Aβ antibodies are currently the furthest advanced. But the question remains: what are the most important forms of Aβ to target? Our study points to some interesting answers,” said Dominic Walsh, Ph.D., a principal investigator.

Aβ protein can take forms ranging from monomers — single molecules — to twisted tangles of plaques that can pollute the brain and are large enough that they can be seen with a traditional microscope.

Walsh compares monomers to single Lego bricks, which can start sticking together to form complex structures of varying sizes.

The recently published studies investigate how to find new potential therapeutics that can target the structures most likely to cause harm.

Most Alzheimer’s disease studies use synthetic Aβ to approximate what conditions in the brain of an Alzheimer’s patient might be like. A small number of researchers have used Aβ extracted from human brain, but the extraction process is crude.

In one of the studies, published in Acta Neuropathologica, Walsh and colleagues developed a much gentler extraction protocol to prepare samples from subjects with Alzheimer’s disease.

The team found that Aβ was far more abundant in traditional crude extracts, but that the bulk of the extracted Aβ was non-harmful. In contrast, much less Aβ was obtained with the gentler protocol, but in this case most of the Aβ was toxic.

In a second study published in Nature Communications, Walsh and colleagues developed a screening test to try to find potential drugs to target the toxic forms of Aβ. The new technique uses extracts of brain samples from Alzheimer’s disease patients and live-cell imaging of stem-cell derived brain cells to find promising therapeutics.

The researchers discovered that 1C22, an Aβ antibody, could protect against toxic forms of amyloid-beta more effectively than the most clinically advanced Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics currently in clinical trials.

“We anticipate that this primary screening technique will be useful in the search to identify more potent anti-Aβ therapeutics in the future,” said Walsh.

Source: Brigham and Women’s Hospital/EurekAlert

Alzheimer’s Research Targets Variants of Sticky Brain Proteins

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Alzheimer’s Research Targets Variants of Sticky Brain Proteins. Psych Central. Retrieved on September 28, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 1 Aug 2018 (Originally: 1 Aug 2018)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 1 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.