Tactics to Avoid Infidelity
New research highlights methods to maintain love in our intimate relationships and also identifies predictors or risk factors for failed relationships. The topic is timely for Valentine’s Day, a time many use to share our love to special individuals. The study is the first to find evidence of psychological responses that help a person avoid infidelity.
Florida State University (FSU) psychology researchers Jim McNulty, Andrea Meltzer, Anastasia Makhanova, and Jon Maner discovered factors that lead to infidelity, as well as prevent it. Their findings provide reassurance that many of us are equipped with the basic psychological instincts to have a successful intimate relationship that lasts.
The research, which appears in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology confirms that cheating on a partner is one of the surest ways to cause a breakup.
Investigators believe the findings are more important than ever. The divorce rate in the United States ranges between 40 and 50 percent, and the ubiquity of social media makes it easier to connect with others. There is a compelling need, the researchers concluded, to develop new ways that help people maintain long-term relationships.
The FSU research team followed 233 newly married couples for up to three and a half years and documented intimate details about their relationships. The introspection included assessment of marital satisfaction, long-term commitment, whether they had engaged in infidelity and if they were still together.
McNulty, Meltzer, Makhanova, and Maner tested two psychological processes that everyone shares in varying degrees: Attentional Disengagement and Evaluative Devaluation of potential romantic partners.
Disengagement from possible partners is the ability to direct attention away from an attractive person who could be considered a romantic option.
Devaluation of possible partners is a tendency to mentally downgrade the attractiveness of another person, even if he or she is especially good looking.
The team tested newlyweds on those processes by showing them photographs of highly attractive men and women, as well as average-looking men and women.
Researchers discovered that participants who quickly disengaged their attention from an attractive person were less likely to engage in infidelity. The time of that response was notable: Individuals who looked away in as little as a few hundred milliseconds faster than average were nearly 50 percent less likely to have sex outside marriage.
Conversely, partners who took significantly longer to look away from romantic alternatives had a higher risk of infidelity, and their marriages were more likely to fail.
The tendency to devalue, or downgrade, the attractiveness of potential romantic partners also lowered the risk of infidelity and raised the likelihood of maintaining the relationship. Faithful people evaluated romantic alternatives much more negatively.
Both reactions — disengagement and devaluation — minimized the risk of infidelity and, consequently, were predictors of relationships with a higher likelihood of succeeding.
These reactions are typically automatic, according to McNulty.
“People are not necessarily aware of what they’re doing or why they’re doing it,” said McNulty, the lead author of the study. “These processes are largely spontaneous and effortless, and they may be somewhat shaped by biology and/or early childhood experiences.”
The FSU research team believes these findings could offer mental health practitioners practical suggestions to help people stay committed to their partners.
While the processes may be ingrained to some degree, McNulty said a growing body of research suggests people may be able to boost their psychological ability to employ disengagement or devaluation when tempted.
The study also identified some of the strongest predictors of infidelity. These included age, marital satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, attractiveness, and history of short-term relationships.
Researchers found younger people and those less satisfied with their relationships were more likely to be unfaithful.
Surprisingly, people satisfied with sex in their relationship were more likely to engage in infidelity, perhaps suggesting they felt more positive about sex in general and would seek it out regardless of how they felt about their main relationship.
Another predictor of infidelity was attractiveness. A person’s own attractiveness was negatively associated with infidelity among women but not men — meaning less attractive women were more likely to have an affair.
A partner’s attractiveness was negatively associated with infidelity among men but not women — meaning men were more likely to be unfaithful when their partners were less attractive.
A person’s history of sex was a predictor of infidelity, too. Men who reported having more short-term sexual partners prior to marriage were more likely to have an affair, while the opposite was true for women.
“With the advent of social media, and thus the increased availability of and access to alternative partners, understanding how people avoid the temptation posed by alternative partners may be more relevant than ever to understanding relationships.”
Source: Florida State University
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Tactics to Avoid Infidelity. Psych Central. Retrieved on July 9, 2020, from https://psychcentral.com/news/2018/02/14/tactics-to-avoid-infidelity/132527.html