advertisement
Home » News » Our ‘Rose-Colored Glasses’ Tint Not Just Our Own But The Lives of Others

Our ‘Rose-Colored Glasses’ Tint Not Just Our Own But The Lives of Others

New research suggests that we see not only our own lives, and also those we care about, through rose-tinted glasses. Investigators from City, University of London, University of Oxford and Yale University say the study is the first to show that such an “optimism bias” extends beyond the self.

They found that people readily changed their beliefs about a person they like when receiving good news but barely changed their opinions about them after receiving bad news.

This “vicarious optimism” in their learning about others was found to be stronger the more people cared about another person, and was even seen for strangers.

Investigators created a novel experimental design to examine how far this optimism bias extended. Specifically, they studied a mechanism known as “good news/bad news effect” that generates and protects our optimism.

In life we sometimes change our beliefs about ourselves based on new information we receive. For example, when told the good news that we are more intelligent than we thought, we update our beliefs. But if we hear we are less intelligent than we suspected, we change little.

This learning bias appears to arise from the desire to feel good about ourselves and our future.

But we also want to feel good about the future of people we care about. Bad news for people we care about feels dreadful, potentially preventing us from integrating such information into our beliefs about these people.

This “good news/bad news effect” can also tell us how much someone cares about another person, as the more we care about another person, the more likely we are to accept good news about that person and reject bad news.

To test if such an optimism bias extends beyond the self, the researchers recruited more than 1,100 participants for five studies. In each of these studies, participants imagined a host of negative life events happening to other people, ranging from their friends to strangers.

For a friend, for instance, participants imagined a negative life event (losing one’s luggage, getting cancer, missing an important meeting…) happening to them. They were then asked to indicate the likelihood of such an event occurring. Following this they were told the actual probability of such an event taking place.

Sometimes, this information was good news — it was lower than participants expected. And other times, this information was bad news — it was higher than they expected.

To measure how much people used good and bad news to change their belief about the other person, participants were then given a second chance to indicate the likelihood of the event occurring to their friend having previously been told the actual probability. The differences between their estimate before and after receiving the news is taken as an index of belief change.

The researchers found that the optimism bias indeed extends beyond the self, and that this effect was stronger the more people cared about another person. If participants, for instance, first read information about a stranger indicating that this person was a good person, they showed subsequently vicarious optimism for that person.

However, if they read that a stranger was not a nice person, the vicarious optimism decreased substantially for that person. Finally, the more pronounced the vicarious optimism for a stranger, the more likely participants were to help people similar to that stranger.

Dr. Andreas Kappes, lead author of the study and a lecturer in the Department of Psychology at City, University of London, said:

“Our research shows that we see not only our own lives through rose-tinted glasses, but also the lives of those we care about,” he said. “What we found is that participants showed vicarious optimism when learning about the outcomes affecting others they care about, updating their beliefs less in response to bad news compared to good news. But this optimism did not stop with friends — it also extended to strangers when learning about their future.”

Dr. Molly Crockett, senior author of the study and assistant professor of psychology at Yale University, said, “These studies suggest that empathy affects how we learn as well as how we make decisions. Those people with stronger ‘vicarious optimism’ for strangers were more likely to help a stranger in need. Concern for others leaves its fingerprints on the beliefs we develop about the world.”

The research appears in the journal Psychological Science.

Source: City University London

Our ‘Rose-Colored Glasses’ Tint Not Just Our Own But The Lives of Others

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Our ‘Rose-Colored Glasses’ Tint Not Just Our Own But The Lives of Others. Psych Central. Retrieved on September 23, 2018, from https://psychcentral.com/news/2018/02/05/we-view-our-life-through-rose-colored-glasses/132150.html

 

Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 5 Feb 2018
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 5 Feb 2018
Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.