advertisement
Home » News » Parenting » Controversy Over Children’s Screen-Time Recommendations
Controversy Over Children’s Screen-Time Recommendations

Controversy Over Children’s Screen-Time Recommendations

A new UK research study from Oxford University suggests American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended screen-time limits on children aged two to five are too restrictive. The AAP proposes a limit of one to two hours per day, as good for the psychological-wellbeing of young children.

The new findings are consistent with prior Oxford research that advocates that there is little or no support for the theory that digital screen use, on its own, is bad for young children’s psychological wellbeing.

In our current society, digital screen use is a staple of contemporary life for adults and children, whether they are browsing on laptops and smartphones, or watching TV. Pediatricians and scientists have long expressed concerns about the impact of overusing technology on people’s wellbeing.

However, new Oxford University research suggests that existing guidance managing children’s digital media time may not be as beneficial as first thought.

Earlier this year the team published a paper disputing digital device guidelines for teenagers and proposing that a moderate amount of screen-time, known as the “Goldilocks” period, might actually boosts teenage wellbeing.

In the new study, published in the journal Child Development, researchers from the Oxford Internet Institute and Cardiff University conducted a similar study, assessing the impact of screen-time on children aged two to five.

The team tested screen use guidelines using data from approximately 20,000 telephone interviews with parents. From the information obtained from the parent(s), the authors assessed the relationship between their children’s technology use and wellbeing.

Over the course of a month this relationship was measured in terms of caregiver attachment, impact on emotional resilience, curiosity and positive effect. The results revealed a number of interesting findings that suggest that limiting children’s digital device use is not necessarily beneficial for wellbeing.

The team found no consistent correlations between either the 2010 or revised 2016 advised digital usage limits and young children’s wellbeing. While children aged two to five whose technology usage was limited in-line with AAP guidance showed slightly higher levels of resilience, this was balanced by lower levels of positive affect.

Further research indicates similar results to those reported in the recent study of adolescents; that moderate screen-use above the recommended limits might actually be linked to slightly higher levels of children’s wellbeing.

Lead author Dr Andrew Pryzbylski, of the Oxford Internet Institute, said: ‘Taken together, our findings suggest that there is little or no support for the theory that digital screen use, on its own, is bad for young children’s psychological wellbeing.

“If anything, our findings suggest the broader family context, how parents set rules about digital screen time, and if they’re actively engaged in exploring the digital world together, are more important than the raw screen time. Future research should focus on how using digital devices with parents or care-givers and turning it into a social time can effect children’s psychological wellbeing, curiosity, and the bonds with the caregiver involved.”

Study findings also discovered that digital screen use increases with age, is higher in boys, non-whites, children with less educated caregivers, and children from less affluent households.

The authors found the AAP guidelines themselves to be based on out-of-date research, conducted before digital devices had become so ingrained into everyday life. As a result of this time lapse, they are becoming increasingly difficult to justify and implement.

Co-author Dr. Netta Weinstein, a senior lecturer in psychology at Cardiff University, said: “Given that we cannot put the digital genie back in the bottle, it is incumbent on researchers to conduct rigorous, up-to-date research that identifies mechanisms by and the extent to which screen-time exposure might affect children.”

Pryzbylski adds in conclusion, “To be robust, current recommendations may need to be re-evaluated and given additional consideration before we can confidently recommend that these digital screen-time limits are good for young children’s mental health and wellbeing.”

Source: Oxford University

Controversy Over Children’s Screen-Time Recommendations

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2017). Controversy Over Children’s Screen-Time Recommendations. Psych Central. Retrieved on September 21, 2018, from https://psychcentral.com/news/2017/12/15/controversy-over-childrens-screen-time-recommendations/129982.html

 

Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 15 Dec 2017
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 15 Dec 2017
Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.