Home » OCD » In OCD, Actions are at Odds with Beliefs
In OCD, Actions are at Odds with Beliefs

In OCD, Actions are at Odds with Beliefs

UK scientists have developed a mathematical model that may help shed light on the underlying processes of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Their findings, published in the journal Neuron, show that although individuals with OCD develop a deep and accurate sense of how things work, they do not use it to guide their behavior.

“This study shows that the actions of people with OCD often don’t take into account what they’ve already learned,” says senior author Benedetto De Martino, principal investigator of the Brain Decision Modelling Laboratory at University College London. The study was led by graduate students Matilde Vaghi and Fabrice Luyckx.

In the study, the research team was able to measure the degree to which beliefs and action were dissociated from one another, and they found that the degree of difference could predict the severity of OCD symptoms.

“This was very surprising to me,” De Martino adds. “It’s the first time anyone has been able to calculate the degree of dissociation and show that it correlates with the severity of the disease.”

The focus of the research is geared toward developing a deeper understanding of the connection between confidence and action. Specifically, the team analyzed how certainty guides the decisions that people make. For example, if you know for sure that it will rain, you will take an umbrella with you.

“But we suspect that in people with OCD, this link is broken,” De Martino explains. “Someone with OCD will tell you that they know their hands are clean, but nevertheless they can’t stop washing them. Two things that are normally linked together — confidence and action — have become uncoupled.”

The researchers developed a test to measure this phenomenon. They recruited 49 volunteers (24 with OCD and 25 matched controls) to play a video game in which they had to catch coin-like objects in a bucket.

After several games, all of the participants were able to state with confidence where they thought the coins were coming from. Yet while the healthy participants were able to position their buckets based on that belief, those with OCD continued to second guess themselves, disregarding the confidence they felt and chasing every coin by constantly moving their buckets around.

This particular study belongs to a fairly new field of research known as computational psychiatry, which is focused on developing mathematical models to better understand the differences in the brain that lead to harmful behaviors.

“Medicine today is very much about decoding the mechanisms in the body,” De Martino says. “When we are talking about something like a heart valve, that’s a mechanical part that can be clearly understood. But the brain is a computational device that has no mechanical parts, so we need to develop mathematical tools to understand what happens when something goes wrong with a brain computation and generates a disease.”

“This model not only gives us greater insight into OCD, but also into the normal, healthy brain as well,” says De Martino. “Just as studying people with lesions in the hippocampus has historically taught us about the inner workings of memory, studying people with OCD can give us new insights into how beliefs and actions are linked.”

De Martino notes that once such tools are developed, they may help develop new approaches for diagnosis, which could lead to early detection and early intervention. “This would be a game-changer in the field,” he concludes.

Source: Cell Press

In OCD, Actions are at Odds with Beliefs

Traci Pedersen

Traci Pedersen is a professional writer with over a decade of experience. Her work consists of writing for both print and online publishers in a variety of genres including science chapter books, college and career articles, and elementary school curriculum.

APA Reference
Pedersen, T. (2018). In OCD, Actions are at Odds with Beliefs. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 28, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 29 Sep 2017)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.