Home » News » TBI Recovery, Better Sleep-Wake Cycle May Go Hand-in-Hand
TBI Recovery, Better Sleep-Wake Cycle May Go Hand-in-Hand

TBI Recovery, Better Sleep-Wake Cycle May Go Hand-in-Hand

People who sustain a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) often experience significant changes in their sleep-wake cycle. A new study shows that consciousness and thinking abilities in TBI patients tend to return hand-in-hand with a healthier sleep-wake cycle.

“These results suggest that monitoring a person’s sleep-wake cycle may be a useful tool for assessing their recovery after TBI,” said study author Nadia Gosselin, Ph.D., of the University of Montréal in Québec, Canada.

“We found that when someone sustained a brain injury and had not recovered a certain level of consciousness to keep them awake and aware of their surroundings, they were not able to generate a good sleep-wake cycle. But as they recovered, their quality of sleep improved.”

A good sleep-wake cycle is defined as being alert and active during the day and getting uninterrupted sleep at night.

For the study, the researchers evaluated 30 people, ages 17 to 58, who had been hospitalized for moderate to severe TBI. Most of the patients were in a coma when they were admitted to the hospital and all initially received care in an intensive care unit.

The injuries were caused by motor vehicle accidents for 20 people, falls for seven people, recreational or sports injuries for two people and a blow to the head for one person. The patients were hospitalized for an average of 45 days; monitoring for the study began an average of 21 days into a person’s stay.

Each patient was monitored daily for an average of 11 days for level of consciousness and thinking abilities using the Rancho Los Amigos scale, which ranges from 1 to 8. An activity monitor was placed on each patient’s wrist so researchers could keep track of sleeping patterns.

Researchers discovered that consciousness and thinking abilities improved hand-in-hand with measures of quality of sleep, showing a linear relationship.

One measure — the daytime activity ratio— shows percentage of activity that occurs during the day. Immediately after the injury, activity occurs throughout the day and night.

The findings show that participants reached an acceptable sleep-wake cycle, with a daytime activity ratio of at least 80 percent, at the same point when they emerged from a minimally conscious state.

When patients receive a score of 5 on the Rancho Los Amigos scale, they are able to follow simple commands but are still quite confused and give inappropriate responses to stimuli.

When sleep-wake cycles finally reached adequate levels, it was at the same time that patients reached a score of 6 on the Rancho Los Amigos scale, which is when people can give appropriate responses while still depending on outside input for direction. At that level, patients are able to recall relearned tasks, but cannot remember new tasks.

The results were the same when researchers adjusted for the amount of time that had passed since the injury and the amount of medications they had received while they were in the ICU.

“It’s possible that there are common underlying brain mechanisms involved in both recovery from TBI and improvement in sleep,” said Gosselin. “Still, more study needs to be done and future research may want to examine how hospital lighting and noise also affect quality of sleep for those with TBI.”

The findings are published in the journal Neurology.

Source: American Academy of Neurology

TBI Recovery, Better Sleep-Wake Cycle May Go Hand-in-Hand

Traci Pedersen

Traci Pedersen is a professional writer with over a decade of experience. Her work consists of writing for both print and online publishers in a variety of genres including science chapter books, college and career articles, and elementary school curriculum.

APA Reference
Pedersen, T. (2018). TBI Recovery, Better Sleep-Wake Cycle May Go Hand-in-Hand. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 29, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 29 Dec 2016)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.