New research finds that minimizing “mean girl” behavior benefits the entire classroom — not just the aggressive girls for whom the program was developed.
Specific or targeted efforts to reduce relational aggression among at-risk urban girls has been the focus of the Friend to Friend (F2F), a program developed by researchers at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP).
Relational aggression, popularized as “mean girl” behavior, is nonphysical, using gossip and social exclusion to manipulate social standing or reputations. In contrast to the physical aggression more prevalent among boys, relational aggression is the most common type of aggression among girls.
“This new study builds on our work over the past decade in developing evidence-based programs to curb relationally aggressive and bullying behaviors to create a healthier social environment in schools,” said study leader Stephen S. Leff, Ph.D., co-director of the Violence Prevention Initiative at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP).
“Our findings suggest that this intervention appears to have a strong broad impact that goes beyond the primary focus of the program.”
Leff and co-authors Tracy Evian Waasdorp and Brooke S. Paskewich have published their findings online in the journal Behavior Modification.
The study team examined the broader effects of Friend to Friend (F2F), as part of a school-based randomized trial comparing F2F to a control group using an education-based intervention called Homework, Study Skills, and Organization (HSO).
F2F is a 10-week, 20-session small group intervention designed for urban African-American third to fifth grade girls that teaches problem-solving, anger management strategies, and leadership skills.
In addition, halfway through the intervention, the girls work with facilitators in the classroom to co-lead 10 full classroom sessions of the F2F curriculum in an effort to reinforce the skills they learned and to promote their leadership and reputation change.
A 2015 study established F2F as the first and only relational aggression intervention to demonstrate a decrease in relationally aggressive behaviors among urban minority girls that continued at least a year after the conclusion of the program.
Adding to this finding, this current study determined that F2F also had a broader impact on students not participating in the primary intervention. These students only experienced the program through the classroom lessons that the F2F girls helped to run in their classrooms.
Six hundred and sixty five youth (46.3 percent male) from six schools within the School District of Philadelphia participated in the 2016 study. They were in third, fourth, and fifth-grade classrooms which had aggressive girls randomized to either F2F or to HSO.
These students rated their classmates on a series of behaviors (e.g., being nice, spreading rumors) while their teachers assessed their own relationships with each student.
After the intervention, not only did the targeted aggressive girls participating in F2F improve their behaviors, but boys within these girls’ classrooms scored higher in peer-ratings of positive friendships and being nice, and scored lower in peer ratings of rumor-spreading, exclusion, and fighting, compared to boys in HSO.
The boys also had more positive relationships with their teachers than similar boys in HSO classrooms. Even girls in the F2F classrooms who were not involved in the direct group intervention were rated by peers as being higher in positive friendships and being nice compared to girls in the HSO classroom.
“A program focused on improving behaviors among urban aggressive girl students also had positive effects on non-targeted students and served to improve the classroom climate,” says Dr. Leff.
“We hope our future studies will determine why the program has such strong effects for non-targeted youth. Regardless, we are excited about the initial impact, and feel that the program has great potential for helping aggressive girls and their classmates.”