Home » News » Science Explains Why Older People Take Less Risks
Science Explains Why Older People Take Less Risks

Science Explains Why Older People Take Less Risks

It is an accepted fact that as we age, we take less risks. New research suggests the reason we do this may be linked to a declining chemical in our brain — rather than wisdom gained through the ages.

Researchers have now discovered dopamine, a brain neurotransmitter, declines at the same rate as our daring or risk-taking tendencies.

Dopamine helps control our brain’s reward and pleasure centers and helps regulate movement and emotional responses. It enables us not only to see rewards, but to take action to move toward them.

In the study, investigators from University College London followed over 25,000 people and found that older people were less likely to choose risky gambles to win more points in a smartphone app called The Great Brain Experiment.

However, they were no different to younger participants when it came to choosing risky gambles to avoid losing points. It is widely believed that older people don’t take risks, but the study shows exactly what kind of risks older people avoid.

Investigators discovered the steady decline in risky choices with age matches a steady decline in dopamine levels. Throughout adult life, dopamine levels fall by up to 10 percent every decade.

In a prior study, researchers found that volunteers chose significantly more risky gambles to win more money when given a drug that boosted dopamine levels.

“As we age, our dopamine levels naturally decline which could explain why we are less likely to seek rewards,” explains lead author Dr. Robb Rutledge.

“The effects we saw in the experiment may be due to dopamine decline, since age was associated with only one type of risk taking and mirrored the known effects of dopamine drugs on decision making.

Older people were not more risk-averse overall, and they didn’t make more mistakes than young people did. Older people were simply less attracted to big rewards and this made them less willing to take risks to try to get them.”

The experiment involved 25,189 smartphone users aged 18-69 who played a game in The Great Brain Experiment smartphone app that involves gambling for points.

In the game, players start with 500 points and aim to win as many points as possible in thirty different trials where they must choose between a safe option and a risky 50/50 gamble.

In the ‘gain’ trials, players can either choose a guaranteed number of points or a 50/50 chance of winning more points or gaining nothing. The ‘loss’ trials are the same in reverse, where players can lose a fixed number of points or gamble with a chance of losing more points or nothing.

In the ‘mixed’ trials, players can choose zero points or to gamble with a chance of either gaining or losing points.

On average, all age groups chose to gamble in approximately 56 percent of the loss trials and 67 percent of the mixed trials. In the gain trials, 18-24 year olds gambled in 72 percent of trials and this fell steadily to 64 percent in the 60-69 age group.

In the study, researchers developed mathematical equations which provided specific predictions for how the loss of dopamine would affect decision making.

“A loss of dopamine may explain why older people are less attracted to the promise of potential rewards,” says Dr. Rutledge. “Decisions involving potential losses were unaffected and this may be because different processes important for losses are not affected by ageing.

“Political campaigners often frame voting decisions negatively, for example saying that UK households would be £4,300 worse off if the UK decides later this month to leave the EU rather than £4,300 better off if the UK decides to remain part of the EU.

Use of negative verse positive reward statements influence demographic groups in different ways.

In the above example politicians know that negative messaging helps to persuade older people, whereas a more optimistic approach that emphasizes large potential rewards might appeal more to younger people who are less likely to vote.

Our new findings offer a potential neuroscientific explanation, suggesting that a natural decline in dopamine with age might make people less receptive to the positive approach than they would have been when they were younger.”

“This study is an excellent example of the use of digital technology to produce new and robust insights into the workings of the brain. Smartphone apps allowed the researchers to capture decision-making outside of typical ‘lab’ settings, and to reach more people from varied backgrounds than is typically possible, says Dr. Raliza Stoyanova, a member of the government team at Wellcome which funded the project.

He continues, “It will be exciting to see what else the data generated from the Great Brain Experiment will reveal about risk and decision-making, as well as other complex brain processes like memory and attention.”

Source: University College London/EurekAlert

Science Explains Why Older People Take Less Risks

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Science Explains Why Older People Take Less Risks. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 28, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 3 Jun 2016)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.