Emerging research suggests that people may have distinct brain connection patterns leading some to be better at remembering past experiences, while others are better at recalling details.
The findings help to explain why some have richly detailed recollection of past experiences (episodic memory), while others tend to remember just the facts without details (semantic memory).
Researchers from the Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest Health Sciences discovered that these different ways of experiencing the past are associated with distinct brain connectivity patterns that may be inherent to the individual and suggest a life-long “memory trait”.
The study was recently published online in the journal Cortex.
“For decades, nearly all research on memory and brain function has treated people as the same, averaging across individuals,” said lead investigator Dr. Signy Sheldon.
“Yet as we know from experience and from comparing our recollection to others, peoples’ memory traits vary. Our study shows that these memory traits correspond to stable differences in brain function, even when we are not asking people to perform memory tasks while in the scanner.”
Investigators had 66 healthy young adults (average age 24) complete an online questionnaire — the Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM). This tool helps to describe how well an individual remembers autobiographical events and facts.
Participant’s responses fell between the extremes seen in people with Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM) or Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory (SDAM). This allowed researchers to study normal variation in autobiographical memory.
Then, after filling out the online survey, the 66 participants had their brains scanned at with resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging — a technique that maps patterns of brain connectivity, or how activity correlates across different brain regions.
The researchers focused on connections between the brain’s medial temporal lobes and other brain regions. The medial temporal lobes are well known to be fundamentally involved with memory function.
Those who endorsed richly-detailed autobiographical memories had higher medial temporal lobe connectivity to regions at the back of the brain involved in visual processes. In contrast, those tending to recall the past in a factual manner (minus the rich details) showed higher medial temporal lobe connectivity to areas at the front of the brain involved in organization and reasoning.
The findings raise interesting questions for cognitive scientists, related to aging and brain health.
One of the more provocative inquiries: could certain memory traits be protective, delaying the manifestation of age-related cognitive decline in later years?
“With aging and early dementia, one of the first things that people notice is difficulty retrieving the details of events,” said the study’s senior author Dr. Brian Levine.
“Yet no one has looked at how this relates to memory traits. People who are used to retrieving richly-detailed memories may be very sensitive to subtle memory changes as they age, whereas those who rely on a factual approach may prove to be more resistant to such changes,” he said.
Could a person’s profile of memory traits help guide treatment of memory issues in later life?
Researchers believe the new findings open the door to exciting possibilities that require further scientific exploration. Follow-up studies are now being conducted relating memory traits to personality, psychiatric conditions such as depression, performance on other cognitive measures, and genetics.