Despite recent judicial rulings, same sex couples face social challenges ranging from discrimination and stigma to unique relationship needs.
To help address these disparities, psychology researchers are testing a relationship education program to address the distinctive needs of female same-sex couples.
Sarah Whitton, a University of Cincinnati associate professor of psychology will discuss her findings as part of a symposium at the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT) 49th Annual Convention in Chicago.
Whitton explains that same-sex couples face a variety of obstacles including a lack of role models for their long-term relationships and marriages. Furthermore, same-sex female couples suffer breakups more often and more quickly than heterosexual couples.
In context, relationship education programs for heterosexual couples have shown effectiveness in improving relationships and their stability.
However, researchers explain that these programs contain considerable heterosexual bias and fail to address challenges for same-sex couples, such as discrimination and lack of social support, most notably lack of support from their own families.
As such, Whitton and her team developed a relationship education program around proven strategies to build core relationship skills and effective couple communications. This training will help to keep conflicts from escalating into destructive confrontations.
To help participating couples learn these skills, videos were developed in which female same-sex couples demonstrated negative, destructive encounters as well as positive, effective communication techniques.
Whitton says the program also includes newly developed material to address the unique needs of female same-sex couples. Couples are taught coping strategies for facing stigma and other issues that could impact the quality of their relationships, including issues surrounding children.
“Female same-sex couples also face issues we hadn’t found in our previous research in building such a program for male same-sex couples,” Whitton says.
“Child-related issues were prevalent, as some women had children from a previous heterosexual relationship and others were deciding as a couple how to create families through adoption or donor insemination.
“Another factor affecting female same-sex couples was an interest in maintaining emotional intimacy and being able to communicate about emotionally vulnerable topics,” Whitton says.
“Therefore, the program teaches women strategies for protecting and enhancing their emotional connection.
“We also developed the program around how women could build social support for their relationship,” says Whitton.
“This is one area where same-sex couples face far more challenges than heterosexual couples, because typically they don’t have church support and they may not have family support for their relationship.”
The 10-hour program was tested on 38 couples in the Cincinnati and Denver area and required one six-hour session and two, two-hour evening sessions.
The program involved a lecture, the skill demonstration videos, practicing new skills with feedback from coaches, and group discussion.
At the end of the program, the researchers report that participating couples showed improvements in their positive communication skills and satisfaction with their relationships, compared to couples in a wait list control group.
Whitton says future research will involve testing the program on a larger number of couples and more evaluation of the program’s effectiveness over time.
“We’re also interested in packaging the program and in reaching out to community clinicians, particularly those who work with the LGBT community, to see if they would be interested in using the program and if they can do so effectively.”
Whitton adds that the researchers also want to explore whether the program’s effectiveness might also help reduce physical health disparities affecting lesbian women, including higher rates of cancer, heart disease, smoking, and obesity.