For many, making a relatively simple decision on what one may prefer ends up being a source of stress.
Researchers now believe this difficulty to make a decision is linked to the intensity of the communication between different regions of the brain.
The story is often familiar: You’re in a restaurant and can’t make up your mind what to order. After studying the menu for some time and many discussions, you eventually choose the steak. But you can’t relax during the meal and keep wondering whether you should have gone for the veal after all.
Such difficulties with decisions crop up in all aspects of life, not only food. However, they predominantly affect preference-based decisions, i.e. questions like “what do I prefer — melon or cherries?”
Interestingly, purely sensory decisions based on sensorial information such as “what is bigger — melon or cherry?” are less prone to indecisiveness.
Neuroeconomists from the University of Zurich discovered the intensity of the communication between different regions of the brain dictates whether we are indecisive or not.
A team headed by Professor Christian Ruff discovered that the precision and stability of preference decisions do not only depend on the strength of the activation of one or more brain regions. Instead, the key for stable preference choices is the intensity of the communication between two areas of the brain which represent our preferences or are involved in spatial orientation and action planning.
In the study, the researchers used transcranial alternating current stimulation, a non-invasive brain stimulation method that enables generation of coordinated oscillations in the activity of particular brain regions.
The test subjects did not realize that they were being stimulated. Using this technique, the researchers intensified or reduced the information flow between the prefrontal cortex located directly below the forehead and the parietal cortex just above both ears. The test subjects had to make preference-based or purely sensory decisions about food.
“We discovered that preference-based decisions were less stable if the information flow between the two brain regions was disrupted. Our test subjects were therefore more indecisive. For the purely sensory decisions, however, there was no such effect,” explains Ruff.
“Consequently, the communication between the two brain regions is only relevant if we have to decide whether we like something and not when we make decisions based on objective facts.” There was no evidence of any gender-specific effects in the experiments.
It was not possible to make the decisions more stable by intensifying the information flow. However, the study participants were young, healthy test subjects with highly developed decision-making skills.
Nevertheless, researchers believe the results of the study could be used for therapeutic measures in the future — such as in patients who suffer from a high degree of impulsiveness and indecisiveness in the aftermath of brain disorders.
Source: University of Zurich/EurekAlert