Home » News » Deciphering Memory — Been There, Done That?

Deciphering Memory — Been There, Done That?

Have you ever taken pause trying to decide if an occasion was something you have experienced in the past, or whether the memory came from a dream or your imagination?

Many decisions we make every day are influenced by our memories and the confidence we have in them. But very little is known about how we decide whether we can trust a memory or not.

A new study provides some of the answers. Cedars-Sinai researchers have identified a unique set of neurons in the medial temporal lobe, an area of the brain where memories and memory-based decisions are processed.

They found that the activity of these neurons is indicative of the confidence by which a memory will be retrieved. Their findings have been published in the online issue of Nature Neuroscience.

“The mechanisms that help us make confidence judgments about a memory-based decision are poorly understood, but we know they are impaired by many different diseases and disorders,” said Ueli Rutishauser, Ph.D., assistant professor of neurosurgery and director of human neurophysiology research at Cedars-Sinai.

Some people with amnesia, for example, are overconfident in their decision-making, while others are aware of their poor memories and are able to weigh their judgments accordingly.

As researchers begin to develop treatments for amnesia, an understanding of the brain’s ability to assess the quality of memories, a key component of the memory-making and retrieving process, is critical.

“Because memory and judgment processes impact our everyday lives, we want our confidence level to be an accurate reflection of reality,” he said.

“This study has given us a better understanding of the way certain neurons influence memories, confidence in those memories and decision-making.”

Recording the electrical activity of 1,049 individual nerve cells, the researchers discovered differences between two groups of neurons in the brain’s medial temporal lobe.

One group of neurons are called the visually selective cells. They simply report what is being seen, such as a car, a tree, a dog or a house. These neurons give a running commentary on the environment, but they only respond to stimuli, regardless of whether or not the individual has seen an object before.

In contrast, the second group — memory-selective cells — appears to be directly involved in memory retrieval and confidence.

This group consists of two subgroups: familiarity neurons and novelty neurons. When a person sees something familiar, like their own dog, familiarity neurons are stimulated. When a person sees something new, like a different dog, activity of novelty neurons increases.

The key finding was that the strength of the familiarity and novelty neurons’ activity was proportional with confidence: the larger the increase in activity, the more confidence people expressed that their decision was correct.

By correlating or matching the strength of signals to patients’ responses, the researchers gained insight into the formation of memories and the way people perceive them.

“Our study shows for the first time that visually selective cells are not influenced by memory. In fact, they are functionally and, we believe, anatomically distinct from memory-selective cells,” said Adam Mamelak, M.D., senior author, professor of neurosurgery and director of functional neurosurgery in the Neurosurgery Department.

Defining these differences is important because it may help us target one cell but not another. We currently have no treatment to offer for failing memory, but as treatments are developed, we will want to be extremely selective in which neurons are stimulated and which are not.”

Researchers are quick to point out that the findings show the value of interdisciplinary research accomplished through the combined efforts of neurology and neurosurgery clinicians working closely with neuroscientists. The other vital ingredient, they said, are patients who volunteered to extend the frontiers of science.

Twenty-eight patients with epilepsy took part in the study. They were hospitalized for diagnostic procedures, including implantation of deep-brain electrodes to precisely locate the source of seizures.

This setting gave investigators the rare opportunity to observe the electrical activity of individual brain cells while patients performed a recognition memory test, identifying sequences of images as seen before or not, and rating their confidence in their choices.

Source: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center/EurekAlert!

Deciphering Memory — Been There, Done That?

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Deciphering Memory — Been There, Done That?. Psych Central. Retrieved on October 19, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 10 Jun 2015)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.