Home » News » Best to Plan for Future in Days, Not Months or Years
Best to Plan for Future in Days, Not Months or Years

Best to Plan for Future in Days, Not Months or Years

New psychological research suggests that when people starting to plan for retirement or other big goals, they should pull out a calculator and multiply the years ahead by 365.

Researchers have discovered that measuring time in days instead of months, or months instead of years, can make future events seem closer and thus more urgent.

The new paper is published in the journal Psychological Science.

Investigators discovered that when units of time were manipulated to bring important events closer to the forefront psychologically, people reported that they should start to plan and save significantly earlier, even when future events were described as being tens of thousands of days away.

“This is a new way to think about reaching goals that does not require willpower and is not about having character or caring,” explains psychological scientist and lead researcher Dr. Daphna Oyserman of the University of Southern California.

Oyserman and co-author Dr. Neil Lewis Jr. of the University of Michigan devised a series of seven studies using diverse methods to investigate the relationship between metrics of time and taking action to reach a goal.

First, the researchers assessed how changing the units of time might affect estimates of when an event would occur once preparations were underway.

In two studies, the researchers recruited a total of 162 participants (either online or on a college campus) and asked them to read six scenarios, three with time metrics and three without time metrics.

For the time-metric scenarios, participants imagined that they were shopping, studying, or carrying out other tasks in preparation for various events — a birthday party, presentation, wedding, exam — and were asked to report how long it would be until those events occurred.

The results showed that when participants were primed to consider the time in the smaller of two possible units, the event seemed closer. Specifically, events seemed an average of 29.7 days sooner when considered in days instead of months and an average of 8.7 months sooner when considered in months instead of years.

An additional series of studies evaluated whether shifting the time metric would influence participants’ plans to take action. Specifically, investigators wanted to know if the new motivation resulted from metrics that helped people to connect their future to their present selves.

Adults in the United States were recruited to participate in an online study, yielding more than 1,100 participants across four studies. In each study, the vast majority of participants had some college education.

The researchers primed participants with either one of two time metrics for three randomly assigned scenarios. Participants filled in the blank for when they should start saving, cued by units of either days or years to match the scenario given.

For example, they were asked to say when they would start saving for college that started in either 18 years or in 6,570 days, for retirement starting in 30 years or in 10,950 days, or for retirement starting in 40 years or in 14,600 days.

The results showed that viewing the time as a number of days was associated with participants planning to start saving four times sooner than when the time element was expressed in years. This finding was same regardless of age, income, and education level.

Therefore, the data suggest that the critical factor underlying the effect was whether participants felt connected with their future selves — which fostered congruence between the future and the present. Thus, if the future “us” is more like the present “us” (only older), it may help us put aside present-day rewards (spending) in favor of future rewards (saving).

The researchers conclude that people may be able to get themselves working toward goals earlier by using smaller time metrics to feel closer to their future selves. When that happens, says Oyserman, “investing in the future does not seem like a sacrifice.”

This particular trick of time, she adds, “may be useful to anyone needing to save for retirement or their children’s college, to start working on a term paper or dissertation, pretty much anyone with long-term goals or wanting to support someone who has such goals.”

Source: Association for Psychological Science

Best to Plan for Future in Days, Not Months or Years

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Best to Plan for Future in Days, Not Months or Years. Psych Central. Retrieved on September 25, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 29 Apr 2015)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.