Why do some young people react adaptively while others brood and ruminate?
In a new study, researchers wanted to learn why some youth learn to handle their emotions better than others. They found adolescents who mentally take a step back from their own point of view when thinking about something troubling can deal with negative emotions more effectively and become less upset by them.
The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and University of Michigan, appears in the journal Child Development.
The researchers looked at 226 African American 11- to 20-year-olds from an urban public school in Washington, D.C., asking them about a recent event that made them extremely angry (such as a fight).
The youth then reflected on their experiences and why they felt angry, then told researchers about how they felt and thought about the experiences.
For example, the researchers assessed self-distancing by asking the youth: “When you saw the fight again in your imagination a few minutes ago, how much did you feel like you were seeing it through your own eyes versus watching the fight happen from a distance (like watching yourself in a movie)?” and “When you saw the fight again in your imagination a few moments ago, how far away from the fight did you feel?”
Prior work with adults has shown that self-distancing helps adaptive self-reflection. However, no research has investigated whether adolescents spontaneously engage in this process or whether doing so is linked to adaptive outcomes, say the researchers.
In the study, investigators discovered youth who reflected on their experiences from a self-distanced perspective became less upset than those who reflected from a self-immersed perspective. In part, this was because adolescents who saw their experience from a distance thought about it differently.
These youth were more likely to reconsider the events in meaningful and insightful ways, and less likely to simply replay the upsetting events in their minds. They were also less likely to continue to blame the other person involved in the event (though not less likely to forgive him or her). In turn, these new insights were associated with less emotional distress.
“Mentally stepping back from the event didn’t mean the youth were avoiding their problems,” said Dr. Rachel E. White, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, the study’s lead author. “In fact, they were dealing with them in a more adaptive way.”
The study also found that self-distancing strategies seemed to grow more powerful with age. Older youth who self-distanced became even less upset than younger adolescents who did so.
“These results show that teens can use self-distancing strategies in much the same way as adults,” White notes. “They also suggest that the teen years could be critical in developing this way to regulate emotions.”
A topic not addressed in the current research is if teens can be trained to use these strategies. Prior research does suggest that adults could help youth learn and implement these strategies.
Early studies have shown that the techniques can be taught to children just entering into adolescence as experiments have shown that fifth graders can use self-distancing techniques when instructed to do so — and handle their emotions better as a result.