A new study dispels the notion that a higher surge of testosterone in competition, the so-called “winner effect,” influences performance success.
Dr. David Edwards, a professor of psychology at Emory University, and his graduate student Kathleen Casto studied intercollegiate cross-country runners. They found that while testosterone levels vary during athletic competition, a physiological benefit does not occur.
“Many people in the scientific literature and in popular culture link testosterone increases to winning,” Casto said.
“In this study, however, we found an increase in testosterone during a race regardless of the athletes’ finish time. In fact, one of the runners with the highest increases in testosterone finished with one of the slowest times.”
Researchers analyzed saliva samples of participants and found that testosterone levels rise in athletes during the warm-up period.
“It’s surprising that not only does competition itself, irrespective of outcome, substantially increase testosterone, but also that testosterone begins to increase before the competition even begins, long before status of winner or loser are determined,” Casto said.
Edwards has been collecting data since 1999 on hormone levels of Emory sports teams that have volunteered to participate. Many of the labs’ previous studies involved sports such as volleyball and soccer that require team coordination, intermittent physical exertion, and only overall team outcomes of win or loss.
In the current study, Casto wanted to investigate how hormones relate to individual performance outcomes in cross-country racing.
Cross-country racing is both a team and individual sport. Teams are evaluated through a points-scoring system, but runners are also judged on their individual times, clearly ranking their success in an event.
“Cross country running is a unique sport. It’s associated with a drive to compete and perseverance against pain over a relatively long period of time,” Casto says. “It’s an intense experience.”
Participants in the study were consenting members of the 2010 and 2011 Emory varsity men’s and women’s cross-country teams. Each participant provided three saliva samples: One before warming up (to serve as a baseline), one after warming up, and a third immediately after crossing the finish line.
Testosterone went up from the baseline for both men and women during the warm-up, while levels of cortisol — a hormone related to stress — did not.
At the end of the race, both men and women participants showed the expected increases in cortisol and surges in testosterone. Neither hormone, however, was related to finish time.
This research follows on the heels of a 2013 study of women athletes in a variety of sports by Edwards and Casto, published in Hormones and Behavior.
In this study, they found cholesterol levels were associated with social status and respect.
Specifically, when stress hormones (cortisol) were low, the higher a woman’s testosterone, the higher her status with teammates. The body uses cortisol for vital functions like metabolizing glucose.
“Over short periods, an increase in cortisol can be a good thing, but over long periods of chronic stress, it is maladaptive,” Casto said.
The inverse relationship between cortisol (a product of stress) and testosterone, may influence success either as an athlete or as a work professional. Those that have the ability to mitigate stress have lower amounts of cortisol and more testosterone.
“Among groups of women athletes, achieving status may require a delicate balance between stress and the actions or behaviors carried out as a team leader.”
Higher baseline levels of testosterone have been linked to long-term strength and power, such as higher status positions in companies.
“Although short-term surges of testosterone in competition have been associated with winning, they may instead be indicators of a psychological strength for competition, the drive to win,” Casto said.
Source: Emory University