Home » News » Looking Healthy More Important for Leaders Than Looking Smart
Looking Healthy More Important for Leaders Than Looking Smart

Looking Healthy More Important for Leaders Than Looking Smart

New research suggests looking healthy generally trumps looking intelligent among corporate executives and other industry leaders.

Dutch investigators discovered people look for candidates with a healthy complexion when choosing a leader. They discovered the most intelligent-looking candidates are only chosen for positions that require negotiation between groups or exploration of new markets.

For the research, Brian Spisak, Ph.D., from the VU University Amsterdam and colleagues studied people’s implicit preferences for traits of leaders.¬†They assessed how people viewed features such as health, intelligence, and attractiveness, and how people look for information about these qualities in the physical appearance of others.

Study results are published in the open-access journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Facial traits were a primary area of study because facial characteristics provide a wealth of information about individuals.

For example, in women as well as men, caring and cooperative personalities are statistically more likely to have a more “feminine” face, due to higher estrogen levels, while aggressive risk-takers tend to have higher testosterone levels and a more “masculine” face.

Researchers asked 148 women and men to imagine that they were selecting a new CEO for a company and to repeatedly pick between two photos of male faces.

For each choice, the participants were given a job description that specified the CEO’s main challenge. This was either to drive aggressive competition, renegotiate a key partnership with another company, lead the company’s shift into a new market, or oversee the stable, sustained exploitation of non-renewable energy.

In each choice, both photos were of the same man, whose face had been digitally transformed. His face had been made to look more or less intelligent while his complexion was changed to look more or less healthy.

A stronger general preference for health than intelligence was found. The participants chose more healthy-looking faces over less healthy-looking faces in 69 percent of trials, and this preference was equally strong irrespective of the future CEO’s main challenge.

More intelligent-looking faces were only preferred over less intelligent-looking faces for the two challenges that would require the most diplomacy and inventiveness: renegotiating the partnership and exploring the new market.

“Here we show that it always pays for aspiring leaders to look healthy, which explains why politicians and executives often put great effort, time, and money in their appearance,” Spisak said.

“If you want to be chosen for a leadership position, looking intelligent is an optional extra under context-specific situations whereas the appearance of health appears to be important in a more context-general way across a variety of situations,” he said.

Source: Frontiers/ScienceDaily

Attractive businessman photo by shutterstock.

Looking Healthy More Important for Leaders Than Looking Smart

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Looking Healthy More Important for Leaders Than Looking Smart. Psych Central. Retrieved on September 26, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 11 Nov 2014)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.