Say you are trying to pick a face out of a crowd. It’s a complicated task for your brain — it has to retrieve the memory of the person’s face, then hold it in place while you scan the crowd, paying attention to finding a match.
Now a new study reveals how the brain achieves this type of focused attention: A part of the prefrontal cortex known as the inferior frontal junction (IFJ) controls visual processing areas that are tuned to recognize a specific category of objects.
Scientists know much less about this type of attention, known as object-based attention, than spatial attention, which involves focusing on what’s happening in a particular location.
However, the new study suggest that these two types of attention have similar mechanisms involving related brain regions, according to Robert Desimone, Ph.D., a professor of neuroscience at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and director of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research.
“The interactions are surprisingly similar to those seen in spatial attention,” Desimone said. “It seems like it’s a parallel process involving different areas.”
In both cases, the prefrontal cortex — the control center for most cognitive functions — appears to take charge of the brain’s attention and control relevant parts of the visual cortex, which receives sensory input, he explained.
In the new study, the researchers found that IFJ coordinates with a brain region that processes faces, known as the fusiform face area (FFA), and a region that interprets information about places, known as the parahippocampal place area (PPA). The FFA and PPA were first identified in the human cortex by Nancy Kanwisher, a professor of cognitive neuroscience at MIT.
For the latest study, the researchers used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to scan human brains as the participants viewed a series of overlapping images of faces and houses. Unlike functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which is commonly used to measure brain activity, MEG can reveal the precise timing of neural activity, down to the millisecond, the researchers noted.
The scientists presented the overlapping streams at two different rhythms — two images per second and 1.5 images per second — allowing them to identify brain regions responding to those stimuli.
“We wanted to frequency-tag each stimulus with different rhythms. When you look at all of the brain activity, you can tell apart signals that are engaged in processing each stimulus,” said Daniel Baldauf, a postdoctoral student at the McGovern Institute and the lead author of the study.
Each participant was told to pay attention to either faces or houses. Because the houses and faces were in the same spot, the brain could not use spatial information to distinguish them, the researchers explained.
When the participants were told to look for faces, activity in the FFA and the IFJ became synchronized, suggesting that they were communicating with each other. When the subjects paid attention to houses, the IFJ synchronized instead with the PPA, according to the study’s findings.
The researchers also found that the communication was initiated by the IFJ and the activity was staggered by 20 milliseconds, about the amount of time it would take for neurons to electrically convey information from the IFJ to either the FFA or PPA. The researchers said they believe that the IFJ holds onto the idea of the object that the brain is looking for and directs the correct part of the brain to look for it.
Bolstering this idea, the researchers used an MRI-based method to measure the white matter that connects different brain regions and found that the IFJ is highly connected with both the FFA and PPA.
The researchers are now studying how the brain shifts its focus between different types of sensory input, such as vision and hearing. They are also investigating whether it might be possible to train people to better focus their attention by controlling the brain interactions involved in this process.
“You have to identify the basic neural mechanisms and do basic research studies, which sometimes generate ideas for things that could be of practical benefit,” Desimone said. “It’s too early to say whether this training is even going to work at all, but it’s something that we’re actively pursuing.”
The study, funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, was published in the online edition of Science.