Parental Ed on Spanking Helps to Change Behavior
Parents who spank their children often believe it’s an effective form of punishment. Research has found that parents who spank believe spanking can make children behave or respect them.
That belief drives parental behavior, more so than their level of anger, the seriousness of the child’s misbehavior or the parent’s perceived intent of the child’s misbehavior.
However, decades of research studies have found that spanking is linked to short- and long-term child behavior problems.
In an effort to discover strategies that may inform parents on the dangers of spanking, child psychologist George Holden, Ph.D., investigated if parental education on the negative aspects of spanking would change parent’s attitude about the action.
Holden and three colleagues at Southern Methodist University, Dallas, used a simple, fast, inexpensive method to briefly expose subjects to short research summaries that detailed spanking’s negative impact.
Carrying out two studies, one with non-parents and one with parents, Holden and his co-authors on the research found that attitudes were significantly altered.
“Parents spank with good intentions–they believe it will promote good behavior, and they don’t intend to harm the child.”
“But research increasingly indicates that spanking is actually a harmful practice,” said Holden, lead author on the study.
In the first SMU study, the subjects were 118 non-parent college students divided into two groups: one that actively processed web-based information about spanking research; and one that passively read web summaries.
The summary consisted of several sentences describing the link between spanking and short- and long-term child behavior problems, including aggressive and delinquent acts, poor quality of parent-child relationships, and an increased risk of child physical abuse.
The majority of the participants in the study, 74.6 percent, thought less favorably of spanking after reading the summary.
“Unexpectedly,” the researchers said, “attitude change was significant for both active and passive participants.”
A second study replicated the first study, but with 263 parent participants, predominantly white mothers.
The researchers suspected parents might be more resistant to change their attitudes. Parents already have established disciplinary practices, are more invested in their current practices, and have sought advice from trusted individuals.
But the results indicated otherwise. After reading brief research statements on the web, 46.7 percent of the parents changed their attitudes and expressed less approval of spanking.
“Given the brevity of our intervention, the results are notable,” said the authors.
“Our Web-based approach is less expensive, potentially quicker, and more easily scaled up to use at a community level.”
“With spanking a public health concern, this approach offers a simple way to reach a large audience to change attitudes and reduce parents’ reliance on corporal punishment,” said Holden.
“For example, educational modules could be developed for high school students,” the authors said.
“These studies demonstrate that a brief exposure to research findings can induce positive corporal punishment attitudes in parents and non-parents.”
The researchers believe the study is the first of its kind to find that brief exposure to spanking research can alter people’s views toward spanking.
Previous studies in the field have relied on more intensive, time-consuming, and costly methods to attempt to change attitudes toward spanking.
“If we can educate people about this issue of corporal punishment, these studies show that we can in a very quick way begin changing attitudes,” said Holden.
The findings, “Research findings can change attitudes about corporal punishment,” have been published in the international journal of Child Abuse & Neglect.
Nauert PhD, R. (2015). Parental Ed on Spanking Helps to Change Behavior. Psych Central. Retrieved on February 21, 2017, from https://psychcentral.com/news/2014/01/30/parental-ed-on-spanking-helps-to-change-behavior/65199.html