As women continue to integrate the workplace, old habits of thought die hard — particularly when it comes to conflict situations.
Researchers from the University of British Columbia’s discovered troubling perceptions exist when it comes to women involved in disputes at work.
“Our research shows that when it comes to workplace conflict, women get a bad rap,” said Ph.D. candidate Leah Sheppard, who conducted the study with Karl Aquino, Ph.D.
“We show how the negative stereotyping around so-called ‘catfights’ carry over into work situations.”
In the study, researchers asked participants to assess one of three workplace conflict scenarios, all identical except for the names of the individuals involved: Adam and Steven, Adam and Sarah, or Sarah and Anna.
Investigators discovered that when the scenario depicted female-female conflict, participants perceived there to be more negative implications than the male-male or male-female conflicts.
Participants also judged the likelihood of two managers repairing a frayed relationship roughly 15 per cent lower when both managers were female, versus male-male and male-female.
Participants rated those involved in all-female conflicts as also being more likely to let the argument negatively influence job satisfaction than male-female or male-male quarrelers.
The study also found that female experiment participants were just as likely as males to see the all-female conflict as more negative.
“This study suggests there’s still a long way to go when it comes to the perception of women in the workplace,” Sheppard said. “Hopefully, our findings will help to increase managers’ awareness of this bias, so they don’t let stereotypes guide their decisions on how they staff teams and leverage the full talent of female employees.”
The study is published in the current edition of the journal Academy of Management Perspectives.
Source: University of British Columbia