Home » News » Fun to Watch, But ‘The Biggest Loser’ Flops at Motivating Viewers

Fun to Watch, But ‘The Biggest Loser’ Flops at Motivating Viewers

Fun to Watch, But The Biggest Loser Flops at Motivating ViewersThe television program “The Biggest Loser” is touted as a display of how diet and exercise can help individuals lose weight — no matter their starting point.

But new research suggests the program’s extreme depiction of exercise is more likely to turn people off than get them off the couch, say researchers from the University of Alberta.

The ratings confirm that the show is entertaining. It just doesn’t do anything for people needing to lose weight.

Researchers in the Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation found that watching a short video clip of “The Biggest Loser” fueled negative attitudes toward exercise, raising further questions about how physical activity is shown in the popular media.

“The depictions of exercise on shows like “The Biggest Loser” are really negative,” said lead author Tanya Berry.

“People are screaming and crying and throwing up, and if you’re not a regular exerciser you might think this is what exercise is — that it’s this horrible experience where you have to push yourself to the extremes and the limits, which is completely wrong.”

In the study, researchers randomly assigned 138 undergraduate students into two groups.

One group watched a seven-minute clip — chosen for its extreme depiction of exercise — from early in “The Biggest Loser”‘s ninth season, when competitors were struggling with obesity. A control group watched a segment from the reality show “American Idol.”

Immediately after viewing the clips, participants from both groups were asked to write down their first five thoughts. Students also completed a computer test that measured their automatic attitudes about exercise before they had time to think about the question, plus a hand-written questionnaire.

“We did find that the people who watched ‘The Biggest Loser’ had worse attitudes about physical activity than those who watched the ‘American Idol’ clip,” said Berry, adding that the results were consistent no matter participants’ physical activity levels or weight.

Berry said the results debunk the belief held by some researchers and many in the popular media that such shows can be motivational and get people off the couch. In fact, the negative portrayals of exercise are counterproductive to public health campaigns.

“There’s a lot of effort and good work out there just to get people more active, but it’s such a small voice in this big wash of different depictions of exercise. It’s a big mess.”

Still, perhaps we should not give up on the show as a forum for health education as some episodes feature participants who have lost weight, are physically fit and enjoy exercise.

Berry and her research colleagues are in the process of analyzing the benefits from the more positive follow-up episodes with results to be published next year.

Source: University of Alberta

Obese man at the gym photo by shutterstock.

Fun to Watch, But ‘The Biggest Loser’ Flops at Motivating Viewers

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Fun to Watch, But ‘The Biggest Loser’ Flops at Motivating Viewers. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 29, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 26 Oct 2012)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.