Home » News » Study Examines Free Will, Motivation and the Brain

Study Examines Free Will, Motivation and the Brain

A new research effort investigates the topic of free will and if the belief in control over destiny really makes a difference in how we act.

“Folk psychology tells us if you feel in control, you perform better,” said Dr. Davide Rigoni, an experimental psychologist now at the University of Marseille. “What is crucial is that these effects are present at a very basic motor level, a deep level of brain activity.”

Working with Drs. Marcel Brass and Simone Kuhn of the University of Ghent and the University of Padova’s Dr. Giuseppe Sartori, Rigoni showed that shaking people’s belief in self-mastery impairs their brains’ readiness to act, even before they’re aware of the intention to move.

The study is published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

To see how free will beliefs affect pre-conscious aspects of motor control, the team observed a well-known brain marker of voluntary action: the negative electrical wave of “readiness potential,” which first fires in preparation to move and then, milliseconds later, activates as the brain sends signals to the muscles.

Because the first part is not conscious but is modulated by intention, the researchers thought its strength might reflect belief—or disbelief—in free will.

The study divided 30 men and women ages 18 to 24 into two groups. The experimental group read a text stating that scientists had discovered free will to be an illusion. The control group read about consciousness with no mention of free will. They were instructed to read carefully in preparation for a quiz.

Then the participants performed a “Libet task:” pressing a button whenever and however many times they chose, while indicating on a screen the time they became aware of the intention to act. Meanwhile, an EEG recorded their brain activity.

Finally, participants answered questions assessing their beliefs in free will and determinism, both regarding people in general and themselves in particular.

The questionnaires showed the text worked: the first group’s belief in their own self-determination was weaker than that of the control group’s.

The same effect showed up in the Libet test. The no-free-will group’s EEGs measured brain activity far lower than the control group’s during that first, unconscious phase of readiness potential. Deep in the brain, the gumption to act flagged along with the belief in self-determination.

Impatient with the biological deterministic bent of science—”that genes and brains control us and we have no control,” Rigoni was motivated by a more philosophical question: “Is it better to believe or not believe we are free? What if we all disbelieved in free will?”

The study gives scientific support to his intuition that it is better to believe.

“If we are not free,” he says, “it makes no sense to put effort into actions and to be motivated.”

Source: Association for Psychological Science

Study Examines Free Will, Motivation and the Brain

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Study Examines Free Will, Motivation and the Brain. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 25, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 24 Mar 2011)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.