Home » News » Female Stereotypes Persist in American Films

Female Stereotypes Persist in American Films

Female Stereotypes Persist in American FilmsA new study finds that although female characters are displayed as “tougher” and more “violent,” women continue to take a non-dominant role in most films.

Women are also frequently involved in a romantic relationship with the male lead.

According to Katy Gilpatric, from the Department of Social Sciences at Kaplan University, this points to continued gender stereotypes set within a violent framework of contemporary American cinema.

These have the potential to influence a young viewing audience and their ideas about gender and violence.

Her study is published in Springer’s journal Sex Roles.

Film theorists believe that the action character Lt. Ripley, played by Sigourney Weaver in the movie Alien in 1979, paved the way for a new type of female representation in American popular culture.

It is now common to see female action characters take part in hand-to-hand combat, wield swords, shoot machine guns, and use high-tech weaponry to destroy both people and property – behaviors once exclusive to male action heroes.

Through the analysis of female characters in American action films, Gilpatric’s study explores the portrayal of female heroines to see if it is really transcending traditional gender roles, or rather, rearticulating and representing gender stereotypes in a new guise.

She looked at the most popular, highest-grossing action films (a total of 112) released between 1991 and 2005 featuring violent female action characters with a focus on gender stereotypes, demographics and quantity and type of violence.

Over 58 percent of violent female characters were portrayed in a submissive role to the male hero in the film, and 42 percent were romantically involved with him. The average violent female character was young, white, highly educated and unmarried.

These women engaged in masculine types of violence (fought against males and strangers most of the time, often used weapons and caused high levels of destruction), yet retained feminine stereotypes due to their submissive role and romantic involvement with the dominant male hero character.

Gilpatric concludes: “The debate continues as to whether the few action heroines that we are familiar with, such as Sarah Connor and Lara Croft, have broken down gender barriers in action films.

“This research provides evidence that the majority of female action characters shown in American cinema are not images of empowerment; they do not draw upon their femininity as a source of power, and they are not a kind of ‘post-gender woman’ operating outside the boundaries of traditional gender restrictions.

“Instead, they operate inside highly socially constructed gender norms, rely on the strength and guidance of a dominant male action character, and end up re-articulating gender stereotypes.”

“The success of American action films at the domestic box office can be attributed to the targeted youth audience.”

Source: Springer

Female Stereotypes Persist in American Films

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Female Stereotypes Persist in American Films. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 30, 2020, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018 (Originally: 22 Apr 2010)
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.