Home » News » Partners Who Share Chores Are Happier

Partners Who Share Chores Are Happier

Partners Who Share Chores Are Happier A new Canadian study reviews the impact of gender equity in the workforce including the determination of home responsibilities or duties.

University of Western Ontario researchers discovered couples who share the responsibility for paid and unpaid work (home duties) report higher average measures of happiness and life satisfaction than those in other family models.

The ‘shared roles’ category, where each partner’s unpaid work is within 40-60 percent of the total unpaid work, is a growing category that now represents more than 25 percent of respondents.

Couples are more likely to be in a shared roles model when women have more resources and when the couple is less religious.

The ‘complementary-traditional family’ model — with men doing more paid work and women doing more unpaid work — is declining, but remains the largest category.

Researchers suggest that the shared roles model is advantageous to society in terms of gender equity and its ability to maximize labor force participation by all adults.

It also leaves women less vulnerable in the case of separation, divorce or death of a spouse.

Lead researchers, Rod Beaujot and Zenaida Ravanera from Western’s department of sociology, believe that a key policy challenge in Canada is that of accommodating the shared roles model within diverse families.

To promote this model, they suggest policies that support equal opportunities for men and women to access education and work, provide conditions that facilitate work-life balance and promote greater involvement of men in housework and childcare.

“Adequate childcare facilities and equal opportunity to parental leave should also be a focus of Canadian public policy,” adds Beaujot.

Source: University of Western Ontario

Partners Who Share Chores Are Happier
APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Partners Who Share Chores Are Happier. Psych Central. Retrieved on January 17, 2019, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.