Home » News » Parenting » Challenges for Women Who Support Family

Challenges for Women Who Support Family

IA new study explores the issues a woman confronts when she is the primary support for the family.

According to a University of Missouri scholar, female breadwinners experience a range of emotions and challenges ranging from control, independence, ambition, pressure, worry, guilt and resentment.

Dr. Rebecca Meisenbach believes there are more and more female breadwinners in industrialized societies and they challenge the traditional Western gender norms.
In many countries, the male as breadwinner model is the ‘ideal,’ and it influences the creation of public policies.

The breadwinner ideal has also been linked to issues of masculine identity, such that a husband’s un- or underemployment threatens his perceived masculinity.

Her paper was just published online in Springer’s journal Sex Roles.

In her study, Dr. Meisenbach asks women to talk about and describe how they experience being the breadwinner. She hypothesizes that gender stereotypes and breadwinning may generate more tensions for women than for men, partially because women still face the cultural expectation of taking care of children, even when they are working.

Dr. Meisenbach conducted in-depth interviews with 15 women aged between 26 and 63 years old, recruited via electronic message boards and personal contacts. She asked them about their personal history and work-life expectations; how they became a breadwinner; their experiences as the breadwinner; and to describe the transition to a new situation, if they no longer were the primary breadwinner.

The women’s experiences highlighted six common themes – the ‘essence’ of being a female breadwinner in the midwestern and eastern US:

  • Opportunities for control: though not all women wanted it, many female breadwinners enjoyed having this power
  • Independence, which all women valued as part of their identities
  • Pressure and worry – the downside of being the breadwinner
  • Valuing, or being expected to value, their partner’s contributions to the family as a way of helping him maintain his gender identity
  • Guilt and resentment – women struggling with societal and personal expectations of themselves and their partners
  • Ambition, manifested by goal-setting and a strong drive to achieve.

Dr. Meisenbach’s paper also discusses some practical implications of her findings. On an individual level, knowing these essential experiences of female breadwinners may help women create and manage their own identities.

Couples and families struggling with the implications of the female breadwinner model may find this description of the essence of the female’s experience helpful in managing the way they communicate.

Organizations need to implement policies that recognize that both male and female employees may be the primary source of income for their households.

In Dr. Meisenbach’s view, the challenges that breadwinner motherhood offers to existing family leave policies has not been addressed in corporate America.

Source: Springer

Challenges for Women Who Support Family

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). Challenges for Women Who Support Family. Psych Central. Retrieved on February 21, 2019, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.