Home » News » The Logic of Schizophrenia

The Logic of Schizophrenia

LogicAn interesting new study suggests people with schizophrenia reason more logically than healthy individuals when confronted with a situation where common sense and logic conflict.

The findings emanate from a study in which researchers tested a hypothesis that schizophrenia conveys an enhancement of theoretical over practical reasoning.

They looked at whether tasks that are correct from a theoretical (or formal logical) point of view, but depart from practical knowledge (common sense), were performed better by people with schizophrenia than by healthy controls.

They selected syllogisms testing theoretical reasoning that were deductively valid or invalid, and syllogisms testing common sense that strongly conformed to, or departed from, practical knowledge.

17 people with schizophrenia and 19 healthy controls took part in the study, which was reported in the November issue of the British Journal of Psychiatry. All participating patients were taking antipsychotic medication.

There was no difference between the groups in IQ or years of education. Fifty-three percent of the control group and 65 percent of the schizophrenia group were men.

2 types of syllogism were constructed, in each of which there was a conflict between deductive truth and commonsense truth. The first type were non-commonsense syllogisms that were valid (NCS) e.g. all buildings speak loudly; a hospital does not speak loudly; therefore, a hospital is not a building.

The second type were commonsense syllogisms that were invalid (CS) e.g. if the sun rises, then the sun is in the east; the sun is in the east; therefore, the sun rises.

Participants were asked to accept the first 2 sentences of each syllogism as true, and then to decide on the truth or falsity of the third sentence. Syllogisms were scored as correct if they were answered logically.

It was found that people with schizophrenia significantly outperformed controls. They comment that the results of the study suggest that on a straightforward interpretation, people with schizophrenia reason more logically than healthy controls either because they are better at logic, or because they are worse at common sense.

They hypothesise that it is because they are worse at common sense, but caution that the question remains open.

The results are intriguing, they say, because they shed light on reasoning in schizophrenia, but also have significance beyond schizophrenia research. They suggest that in situations where commonsense knowledge is at stake, normal rationality is violated by people with schizophrenia to a lesser extent than by healthy individuals.

People with schizophrenia seem to have a bias towards theoretical rationality over and above practical rationality. Given that schizophrenia is at its core a pathological state of thinking, the results suggest that concepts of rationality that prioritise theoretical reason over practical reason might apply more accurately in a pathological example of human thinking than in healthy human thinking.

Source: Royal College of Psychiatrists

The Logic of Schizophrenia

Rick Nauert PhD

Rick Nauert, PhDDr. Rick Nauert has over 25 years experience in clinical, administrative and academic healthcare. He is currently an associate professor for Rocky Mountain University of Health Professionals doctoral program in health promotion and wellness. Dr. Nauert began his career as a clinical physical therapist and served as a regional manager for a publicly traded multidisciplinary rehabilitation agency for 12 years. He has masters degrees in health-fitness management and healthcare administration and a doctoral degree from The University of Texas at Austin focused on health care informatics, health administration, health education and health policy. His research efforts included the area of telehealth with a specialty in disease management.

APA Reference
Nauert PhD, R. (2018). The Logic of Schizophrenia. Psych Central. Retrieved on March 21, 2019, from
Scientifically Reviewed
Last updated: 8 Aug 2018
Last reviewed: By a member of our scientific advisory board on 8 Aug 2018
Published on Psych All rights reserved.