The Development of Technology in Counseling and Psychotherapy
“Another problem with the net is that it’s still ‘technology’, and ‘technology’, as the computer scientist Bran Ferren memorably defined it, is ‘stuff that doesn’t work yet’. We no longer think of chairs as technology, we just think of them as chairs.” (Adams, 1999, p. no page)
When discussing the use of technology within therapy I am referring to the medium in which therapy is conducted, not the myriad of applications that adapt hardware and software to allow those with physical impairments to engage in counseling. The use of technology as a part of therapy has the potential to change the profession of talking therapies as we know it. Practitioners appear to have mixed reactions; either being challenged and excited by new opportunities or feeling skeptical, overwhelmed or even frightened by this significantly different way of providing counseling in contrast to traditional methods (Anthony, 2003).
Personally, I have seen the rise and fall of the compact disc (CDs) and minidisk, the move from digital versatile discs (DVDs) to Blu-ray. The change of being shouted out for being on dial up internet when the landline telephone was needed, to being constantly connected to the world wide web in some way. The future prospects that are available within the continuous amalgamation of computers and counseling are extremely exciting to me. This is perhaps a reflection of being born in a timeframe, from 1980 onwards, where myself and others are considered to be digitally native. In this we are believed to be “native speakers” of the digital language in regards to computers, social media, video games and the internet (Prensky, 2001). However Anthony (2003) warns that to blindly leap into embracing technology without considering how to practice using it safely and ethically within counseling is naïve at best, and at worst dangerous for both client and practitioner. On the other hand, to ignore the integration of technology completely, especially as it becomes such a large part of our daily lives, rules out the option for clients to have a choice, as well as the possibilities it may bring, such as improved efficiency.
Barak, et al. (2008) states that technology is slowly but surely finding its way into the therapy room, most commonly in the form of online counseling. Yet it is arguable that technology has already been a recognizable part of therapy and that this is merely now a shift. This would be a move from using technology within therapy, such as tape recording sessions and logging session notes on a computer, to therapy being facilitated by technology. For example self-help cassette tapes were available during in the 1970s (Lang, Melamed, & Hart, 1970) as well as the computer program ELIZA (Weizenbaum, 1966). This program and its enhanced version by Colby, Watt, and Gilbert (1966) would simulate a counseling session by detecting keywords in a client’s inputted text and reflecting it back using pre-set scripts in a Rogerian manner.
The Turing Test developed by Alan Turning (Turing, 1950) is a test in which a human judge has a text conversation with unseen players and evaluates their responses. To pass the test a computer must be able to replace one of the players without substantially changing the results. In other words, a computer would be considered intelligent if its conversation could not be easily distinguished from humans. This means that according to this test, ELIZA may well have been the first program to meet the requirements to be considered as artificial intelligence due to the way in which this program can simulate conversation by adapting to the keywords. However, whilst considered to meet the requirements, ELIZA did not pass the test because after a few minutes of interacting, the conversation becomes hindered and it is obvious that you are talking to a machine.
At the time ELIZA was considered an innovation, yet the limited natural language-processing capacities of the program and the inability to create an internal model representing the user’s responses were found to be frustrating (Zarr, 1984). However, this simulated therapy was found to still be highly significant in facilitating a therapeutic relationship (McGuire & Babbott, 1967; Slack & Slack, 1977; Weizenbaum, 1966). Therefore, this style of self-help in the form of internet-operated software with robotic simulation certainly holds therapeutic value. As we continue to create and integrate technology efficiently into day-to-day therapeutic practice there will be a tipping point where we will cease to call it technology; it will merely be another way in which therapy is done, as highlighted by the quote from Adams (1999) at the beginning of this section.
To greater understand the different ways in which technology is being used to facilitate therapy Anthony (2003) has summarized four parameters of using technology in a therapeutic setting:
- Without visual or audio cues from each party (text only)
- Purely audio cues from each party (telephone)
- Visual and audio cues taking place at a distance (video-conference)
- Remote visual and audio cues (software developed by one party, experienced by the other)
The following section will go on to greater explain the types of online counseling that currently exist.