Study reveals clean air challenge for major Asian cities
Hundreds of millions of city dwellers breathe air so polluted with chemicals, smoke and particles that it dramatically exceeds World Health Organization limits with major impacts on health and the environment.
A major study on the state of air pollution in 20 of Asia’s key cities shows that while there have been improvements in achieving better air quality, air pollution still poses a threat to health and quality of life of many people.
The study led by the Stockholm Environment Institute’s (SEI) centre at the University of York (UK) and the Clean Air Initiative for Asia Cities (CAI-Asia) is being published as Asian Environment Ministers hold the first governmental meeting on urban air quality in Asia on 13-14 December in Yogyakarta, Indonesia as part of the Better Air Quality 2006 Workshop.
The World Health Organization estimates that 537,000 people in Southeast Asia and the Pacific die prematurely each year due to air pollution.
The study found that there has been a general improvement in the ability of Asia cities to manage urban air quality since the 1990s. But air quality in the majority of the cities examined still exceeds international guidelines for the protection of human health for certain pollutants. Concentrations of sulphur dioxide, the gas responsible for acid rain, have stabilized at a relative low level and rarely exceed health guidelines. However, the use of high sulphur fuel content in some countries may result in an increase in emissions.
Emissions of nitrogen dioxide and fine particulate matter, mainly from the transport sector, are of concern in all cities currently experiencing rapid motorization. In addition, tropospheric ozone, a main constituent of photochemical smog, will increase if motor vehicle use continues to rise.
The international collaborative effort was led by the Stockholm Environment Institute’s (SEI) centre at the University of York (UK) and the Clean Air Initiative for Asia Cities (CAI-Asia) together with the Korea Environment Institute (KEI) (Seoul) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (Nairobi). The study was funded by the Swedish International Development Co-operation Agency (Sida), the Korean Ministry of Environment and the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
The study examined the capability to manage air quality and collected air quality data for Bangkok, Beijing, Busan, Colombo, Dhaka, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Hong Kong, Jakarta, Kathmandu, Kolkata, Metro Manila, Mumbai, New Delhi, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Surabaya, Taipei and Tokyo.
The assessment showed that while there are underlying similarities in the air pollution problems in each city, many differences still exist.
Bangkok, Seoul, Shanghai and Singapore, Taipei and Tokyo were identified as having excellent capacity to manage air quality. These cities have achieved major reductions in key emissions but still face the challenge of addressing moderate fine particulate pollution resulting from vehicles fumes.
Colombo, Ho Chi Minh City, Jakarta, Metro Manila and Mumbai were identified as having moderate capability in air quality management. They have achieved reductions in sulphur dioxide emissions but have the challenge of addressing transport-related emissions.
Dhaka, Hanoi, Surabaya and Kathmandu were identified has having limited capability to manage air quality. Air pollution data was limited for key pollutants. These cities have the challenge of improving air quality monitoring as well as further achieving reductions in emissions.
Dr Dieter Schwela, SEI, lead author, said: "Some cities have made tremendous progress in improving their air quality. However, more work needs to be done to address specific pollutants such as fine particulate matter which poses a real threat to human health."
"The study has shown that there is a great opportunity for those cities which need to develop further their air quality management capability to learn from cities such as Hong Kong and Tokyo that are further along the road to achieving better air quality."
The study’s authors recommend further action is required to improve air quality in Asia’s cities.
- Taking a more strategic approach to managing air quality to include all aspects of the problem
- Adopting more stringent vehicle emission standards
- Using more cleaner fuels for motor vehicles, industry and power plants
- Better inspection and source of emissions
- Stricter enforcement of legislation and more stringent standards for air quality
- Harmonization of air quality standards across Asia
- Development of more reliable inventories of air pollution emissions
- Regional approach to air pollution to address transboundary air pollution and global climate change
Notes to Editors
- The study Urban Air Pollution in Asian Cities: Status, Challenges and Management by Dieter Schwela, Gary Haq, Cornie Huizenga, Wha-jin Han, Herbert Fabian and May Ajero (2006) is published by Earthscan: www.earthscan.co.uk To request a review copy from the publisher contact: Gudrun Freese at email@example.com Tel (direct): 020 7 121 3152; Tel (general): 020 7 387 8558
- The Stockholm Environment Institute is an International Independent research institute with its headquarters in Stockholm, Sweden (www.sei.se). Its York Centre is based at the University of York (UK) (www.york.ac.uk)
- The Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities (CAI-Asia, www.cleanairnet.org/caiasia) is a multi-stakeholder network of institutions and individuals committed to improving air quality management (AQM) in Asia.
For More Information
- Dr Dieter Schwela, SEI, University of York can be contacted on +41 79 345 7448
- Dr Gary Haq, SEI, University of York can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org
- Mr Cornie Huizenga, CAI-Asia can be contacted at email@example.com
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 21 Feb 2009
Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.