It's not uncommon to hear a familiar voice in an advertisement but not see the accompanying familiar face. The reason? It's cheaper. It costs less for advertisers to pay for a celebrity's voice than to pay for her or his mug. But new research in the December 2005 issue of the Journal of Consumer Research reveals that an unidentifiable, but recognizable, celebrity voice may actually have more of an effect on the consumer's brand attitude.
"Upon identification of the celebrity, individuals consciously attempted to 'partial out' the perceived influence of their attitude toward that celebrity when asked about their attitudes toward the brand in the advertisement," explain Mark Forehand (University of Washington) and Andrew Perkins (Rice University).
"However, when unable to identify the celebrity, individuals were unaware that their attitudes toward the celebrity were affecting their responses regarding attitude toward the brand in the advertisement."
In their experiment, the researchers found that when a consumer identified the celebrity from the voice, there was no tie between the consumer's feeling for the celebrity and the brand. However, this changed when a consumer could not identify the celebrity. In this instance there was a definite effect on brand attitude.
Source: Eurekalert & othersLast reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 21 Feb 2009
Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.
The aim of psychoanalysis is to relieve people of their neurotic unhappiness so that they can be normally unhappy.
-- Sigmund Freud