Sophia Antipolis, France, 25 November 2005: A pivotal influence on patient outcome in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), reperfusion therapy is the most important component of STEMI treatment. A paper by the ESC on its policy with regard to this topic will be published online today in the European Heart Journal, an official journal of the ESC1.
A clinician may utilise various types of reperfusion, including thrombolytic treatment, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or a combination thereof. Despite this, the paper notes that many countries do not sufficiently implement reperfusion therapy, and as a result, many patients with STEMI do not receive such therapy. For this reason, the ESC decided to review pharmacological and mechanical reperfusion strategies to identify obstacles and find solutions for its implementation.
During a two-day policy conference in June 2005, opinion leaders involved in reperfusion therapy gathered to discuss this issue2. Attendees included authors of existing guidelines, experts in reperfusion therapy from throughout Europe and North America, and representatives of national societies of cardiology and ESC working groups. From this policy conference, opinion leaders came up with several messages for the cardiology community:
- 1. The main objective to achieve at least 75% of reperfusion therapy within the shortest time possible is attainable.
- 2. Practical organisation of reperfusion through regional and national networks must be detailed, with the precise role of each participant detailed and agreed upon.
- 3. Protocols must be written and agreed upon with regard to the type of reperfusion to be offered to patients in order to regulate the administration of reperfusion therapy within a network.
- 4. Early diagnosis of STEMI is essential for timely initiation of therapy – every effort must be made to shorten delays.
- 5. Primary PCI is the preference for reperfusion therapy, as long as it can be delivered by an experienced staff, preferably in a high-volume centre within a reasonable amount of time following first medical contact.
- 6. If primary PCI cannot be delivered in a timely manner, thrombolytic treatment is a valid option particularly within the first three hours after onset of symptoms (pre-hospital thrombolysis preferred over in-hospital thrombolysis). Thrombolysis is not the end of reperfusion therapy and may be followed by intervention whenever necessary.
- 7. Physicians in charge of managing STEMI patients must receive information to help them understand the need to shorten delays and to sometimes abandon practices that can undermine access to reperfusion.
- 8. Quality control is imperative and must be implemented to monitor the efficacy of a reperfusion network.
- 9. Public information is also important, as many times patients cause their own delays between onset of symptoms and start of reperfusion therapy in seeking medical attention.
- 10. To ensure that treatment of infarction receives the attention it deserves, politicians and health authorities should be informed about the need to organise networks of reperfusion therapy at regional and national levels.
- 11. The ESC must make every effort to ensure that messages from this policy conference are received at regional and national levels so that proposed strategies and recommendations are implemented.
Mobilization of the cardiology community with the involvement of health authorities can improve the rate of reperfusion therapy offered to patients. The ESC aims to contribute to this goal in a joint effort with its member national societies.
Source: Eurekalert & othersLast reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 21 Feb 2009
Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.
The best way out is always through.
-- Robert Frost