The subject of universal healthcare is always a hot topic but never more so than in an election year. A recent study in the Journal of General Internal Medicine may have the answer to the question - Will those who currently have health insurance be willing to sacrifice in order to insure the millions of people who do not? The findings suggest that the answer may in fact be yes.
To explore whether the insured would help cover the uninsured, researchers asked 322 insured people to play a board game with a focus on health and insurance. Called CHAT, for Choosing Healthplans All Together, the game gives players a limited number of pegs to allocate to many categories of insurance coverage, including funding to cover the uninsured. Randomly drawn cards representing health problems and crises show players how the plan they designed would work in the case of an illness or injury to themselves or others.
The study demonstrated that when groups of citizens deliberate on this issue, even those with insurance recognize and are willing to accept tradeoffs between having more generous benefits and having coverage for all. During deliberations, individuals voiced sophisticated, cogent arguments for and against giving up some of their benefits to include the uninsured. For example, corresponding author and CHAT co-inventor Susan Dorr Goold notes "For many, choosing this coverage was viewed as insuring themselves against becoming uninsured."
Dr. Goold and the coauthors of this study received the 2002 Mark S. Ehrenreich Prize for Research in Healthcare Ethics for the work reported in this paper.
Source: Eurekalert & othersLast reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 21 Feb 2009
Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.
A neurotic is a man who builds a castle in the sky. A psychotic is the man who lives in it. A psychiatrist is the man who charges them both rent.
-- Jerome Lawrence