Emerging research suggests that encouraging children to gesture at very early ages helps in speech and cognitive development.
Investigators from the University of Chicago determined that examining how much children gesture at an early age may make it possible to identify and intervene with very young children at risk for delays in speech and cognitive development.
Researchers looked at children from a wide variety of backgrounds, including those from advantaged and disadvantaged families, and those who had suffered brain injury.
Their study is published in the online edition of the American Psychologist.
The paper offers evidence-based suggestions, which grew out of the study, for developing diagnostic tools and interventions to enhance language and cognitive development.
The authors found that although language learning varies according to family income and education levels, not all of the impacts are the same.
Although parents from advantaged backgrounds spoke more with their children, there was no difference between advantaged and disadvantaged families in the quality of the word-learning experiences parents gave their children.
Researchers also determined that early gesture — the spontaneous gestures children produce to communicate before and as they are learning to use words — can be used to identify which children with brain injury are likely to go on to develop spoken vocabularies within the typical range, and which children are likely to continue to experience language delay.
The importance of the finding is that this diagnosis can be made before language delays appear in speech, thus opening the door for earlier and more targeted interventions.
“We believe that our findings have implications for prediction and diagnosis of later language deficits and for intervention that may improve language skills,” said lead author Susan Goldin-Meadow, Ph.D., a prominent researcher on gesture and language.
By videotaping samples of children’s and parents’ speech and gestures during interactions at home, the researchers were able to examine in what way and how often gestures were used to communicate, and whether that might help predict the child’s language acquisition.
The researchers also evaluated whether the parents’ speech was related to the children’s development of cognition and language.
“We are also exploring the impact that parent speech might have on variation in children’s cognitive skills.
“This is a long-term project spanning many years that allows us to answer some questions about the natural trajectory of learning and how it’s affected by variations in learners and their environment,” said Susan Levine, Ph.D., a specialist on early mathematics development.
Two groups of children were observed in this study over four years. The first group included 64 families with children ranging from 14 months to nearly five years old without known physical or cognitive disabilities.
Those children were assumed to be typical learners. The families represented a variety of ethnic/racial makeups and family income levels. The second group included 40 families with a child who had suffered a unilateral brain injury before or around the time of their birth.
The researchers videotaped interactions between the child and their primary caregiver (usually the mother) at home during ordinary daily activities for 90 minutes every four months for a total of 12 visits. The interactions were then transcribed for the analysis of all child and parent speech and gestures.
From that analysis, the researchers were able to develop four hypotheses on language and cognitive development:
“We wanted to examine the influence of both environment and the learner on language, so we included children from a wide socioeconomic range to look at variation in learning environments, and children with early brain injuries to study variation in learners,” said Goldin-Meadow.
“We found that the amount and type of input children with brain injury receive from their parents or caregivers plays an even bigger role in syntactic and narrative development (but not vocabulary development) than it does in children without injury,” said Levine.
Goldin-Meadow and colleagues said follow-up studies are needed to determine ways to increase the talk that children hear to enhance their language and thinking skills.
They are hoping that the insights gained from this study and the follow-up studies can be used as a basis for developing educational materials such as videos, computer games, and curricula for preschools.
Source: University of Chicago