niko851
Member

Registered: March 2006 Posts: 82
|
|
Review Date: Tue July 25, 2006
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 1
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
Unknown
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
irritability, price, non-fast acting
|
|
This med really did nothing for me. After the initial 'waiting' period for it to kick in, nothing ever happened. It seemed as if this medication was a placebo. About the only thing it did for me was make me more irritable.
|
|
alisandria
Veteran Member

Registered: August 2006 Posts: 331
|
|
Review Date: Fri September 8, 2006
|
Would you recommend this? Yes |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 2
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
n/a
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
felt like I was in a fog, disorientated, agitated.
|
|
I didn't care for this medication at all, even after being on it for close to a month, I never seemed to get out of the "cloud" I was in. I felt that side affect was worse than the initial anxiety.
|
|
DizzyLizzy
Member

Registered: August 2006 Posts: 20
|
|
Review Date: Mon September 11, 2006
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 3
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
it did help my generalized anxiety
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
lots of side effects, the worst was a constant diziness
|
|
Side effects were numerous and constant... and feeling dizzy 24/7 made it impossible to live a normal life.
|
|
eskielover
Magnate

Registered: October 2004 Posts: 2425
|
|
Review Date: Thu September 14, 2006
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: $20.00| Rating: 5
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
no bad side effects
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
no effect of anxiety
|
|
Buspar was the first medication I was given for my anxiety attacks I started having in 1994. I found that is had no effect on my anxitey level & was like taking nothing. My anxiety level continued to worsen even with the use of buspar.
|
|
Suzy5654
Grand Member
Registered: May 2006 Posts: 928
|
|
Review Date: Sun September 24, 2006
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 1
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
none
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
didn't work at all--no effect
|
|
Didn't work at all for me for depression or anxiety.
|
|
Brookester
Member
Registered: December 2006 Posts: 53
|
|
Review Date: Thu December 21, 2006
|
Would you recommend this? Yes |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 1
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
NONE
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
it doesn't do anything
|
|
this is one of the more worthless meds on the market. It virtually does nothing to one's anxiety level.
|
|
mama2ak
Visitor

Registered: December 2006 Posts: 14
|
|
Review Date: Sat December 30, 2006
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: $10.00| Rating: 1
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
Price
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
Does nothing!
|
|
This did absolutely nothing for my anxiety symptoms on 3 different tries. I have a bottle full of it just sitting in my closet. Blah. It's like drinking water... no effect at all.
|
|
Direction
Magnate

Registered: December 2006 Posts: 2172
|
|
Review Date: Fri January 12, 2007
|
Would you recommend this? Yes |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 7
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
It works
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
Had a tendency to overshoot (going beyond just being calm almost like too calm) in the first 1/2 hour and drop off and then come back up and then drop off too early
|
|
Try it to see if it works for you if not clonzapam might work better
|
|
Thomi
Member

Registered: February 2007 Posts: 21
|
|
Review Date: Fri February 16, 2007
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 2
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
No side effects
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
Didn't help anxiety or improve sleep
|
|
Was on it to curb anxiety but there was no change after taking it for a few months.
|
|
bipolargirl55
Visitor
Registered: February 2007 Posts: 6
|
|
Review Date: Sun February 18, 2007
|
Would you recommend this? Yes |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 9
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
|
|
I t helps me out alot since I've been on it.
|
|
grey
Junior Member

Registered: March 2007 Posts: 7
|
|
Review Date: Tue March 20, 2007
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 2
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
none
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
dizziness, weight gain,
|
|
It had no effects on my anxiety. I think it actually made me more depressed.
|
|
lunakit
Visitor

Registered: April 2007 Posts: 12
|
|
Review Date: Thu April 12, 2007
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 2
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
none
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
none
|
|
No side effects but didn't do anything positive for moods/anxiety either.
|
|
marshall
Visitor
Registered: April 2007 Posts: 4
|
|
Review Date: Sun April 15, 2007
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 1
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
does basically nothing
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
nothing noticable
|
|
I didn't notice any change from this medication.
|
|
bopilar51
Junior Member
Registered: May 2007 Posts: 15
|
|
Review Date: Fri May 11, 2007
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 1
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
less than none
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
does absolutely nothing. I think it is a placebo
|
|
was prescribed twice in a ten year period. first time I didn't notice any change after 6 mo. That was in 85. Was put on Ativan and noticed great positive difference. got taken off ativan by new pdoc who didnt like prescribing benzos. second time last year. now on klonipin. very good
|
|
alwayseek208
Visitor
Registered: June 2007 Posts: 1
|
|
Review Date: Wed July 4, 2007
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 2
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
none
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
Didn't wake up when my kid needed me to.
|
|
I was prescribed this after having sudden 'anxiety attacks' for about a month. I took it for 5 days and really felt as though I was there but not there. Having two very small kids, I couldn't handle not being there for them. On the fifth night, my oldest woke during the night after an 'accident' (still learning) and I had no idea the next morning that my husband had gotten my child up, changed clothes, stripped the bed, and sprayed the mattress pad down outside with the hose. All at 3 in the morning! That scared me, so I stopped the med the next day. Oh, and I still got heart racing and sweats... so it did not really help the nerves to much.
|
|
kabluie
Junior Member

Registered: January 2008 Posts: 9
|
|
Review Date: Thu January 17, 2008
|
Would you recommend this? Yes |
Total Spent: Not Indicated| Rating: 8
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
effective for me at higher doses
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
nausea, dizziness (infrequent)
|
|
I thought this med was worthless and my p-doc crazy (ha ha) until she boosted my dose up to the higher limits (above 50 mg/day). Bingo! I now take it in three doses a day, and am finding myself considerably less anxious. I've had anxiety problems--serious problems--for nearly 20 years and have only found this level of relief with benzos in the past, taken in a reactive sort of mode. The buspar, taken prophylactically, is doing very well for me. You MUST work with your doctor to ramp up to the effective dose.
|
|
sunshinesqrrl
Visitor

Registered: April 2007 Posts: 3
|
|
Review Date: Fri April 4, 2008
|
Would you recommend this? No |
Total Spent: $3.00| Rating: 3
|
|
Positive aspects of this (pros):
|
made me a little high
|
|
Negative aspects of this (cons):
|
shakes, no real relief
|
|
it was not sufficient to control my anxiety and I had some memory loss and insomnia
|
|