Comments on
Bipolar, Pregnant & Visiting the UK? They May Take Your Unborn Baby

Yesterday I brought you the unfortunate story of a Canadian turned away from our borders not because she was a terrorist or criminal — but because she simply had a diagnosis of depression and, more than a year ago, was hospitalized for treatment of it.

Just to show you that the United States isn’t the only backwards country in the world when it comes to discriminating against those with a mental illness, I bring you the much sadder story of an Italian woman who had bipolar disorder, went to the UK for a training course, and wound up being forced to have a C-section without her consent. Wait, what?

Worse, this woman’s forced C-section was approved by a UK court. Apparently, in the UK, having a panic attack is sufficient to remove most of your freedoms and rights.

4 Comments to
Bipolar, Pregnant & Visiting the UK? They May Take Your Unborn Baby

The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. (If there's more than one page, click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.) Jump to reply form.

    Another take on this case is included within the link above, definitely worth a read if wondering what the other sides to this story may be (written with the knowledge of personal experience too).

  2. I disagree, Mrs. S. This woman wasn’t even a UK resident! At worst, she should have simply been sent home to Italy.

    What I don’t understand is why this person even allowed a c-section to be done against her will.

  3. The thing this case highlights is a gross lack of press responsibility.


    And also:

    There’s more legal links out there.

    • True, here’s a good (if not lengthy) summary of the reality of the story:

      Some important points:

      1. The woman didn’t just have a “panic attack” as the original newspaper story claimed. According to the court documents, “the mother has not taken her medication is that she has had a number of very intrusive paranoid delusions.” That’s a pretty big difference.

      2. The mother’s other children weren’t just waiting for their mom to return home. “It seems the Italian courts have placed her two other children with their grandmother because the mother is unable to look after them. ”

      3. The mother wanted to return to Italy, even without her baby. “It seems (paragraph 9) that the mother was escorted back to Italy because she wanted to go there. The judge was critical of doctors for that, because in his view that she was still too mentally ill at that stage, and because her return to Italy reduced the chances of her getting the baby back.”

      4. The government didn’t order the C-section based upon some testimony of social workers. “it was an urgent application first made at 16:16 on 23 August 2012 by the NHS Trust, supported by the clear evidence of a consultant obstetrician and the patient’s own treating consultant psychiatrist, seeking a declaration and order that it would be in the medical best interests of this seriously mentally ill and incapacitated patient, who had undergone two previous elective caesarean sections, to have this birth, the due date of which was imminent (she was 39 weeks pregnant), in the same manner.”

      We stand corrected.


Join the Conversation!

We invite you to share your thoughts and tell us what you think in this public forum. Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. A first name or pseudonym is required and will be displayed with your comment. Your email address is also required, but will be kept private. (Please note that we use gravatars here, which are tied to your email address.) A website/blog/twitter address is optional.

Post a Comment: