Comments on
History of Psychology: A New Twist in the Case of Little Albert

By Margarita Tartakovsky, M.S.
Associate Editor

History of Psychology: A New Twist in the Case of Little AlbertIn 1920, behaviorist John Watson and his graduate student-turned-wife Rosalie Rayner conducted a conditioning experiment that everyone who’s ever taken an intro psychology course knows all too well: They taught 9-month-old Albert to fear a variety of stimuli that were seemingly innocuous to him from the start.

The most famous example involved a rat. When a rat was first placed alongside Little Albert, he appeared interested and unafraid. When the researchers paired the rat with a loud noise, over time, Albert got scared.

In fact, Albert would start crying at the mere sight of the rat, even though the noise was gone. It turned out that Albert’s newfound fear also extended beyond the rat. He started fearing other furry objects.

Watson used this experiment to substantiate his theory that babies were blank states, and the environment was powerful in influencing them. This experiment was always considered controversial, and many psychologists were curious if Albert’s learned fears continued into adulthood. (That’s because Watson and Rayner never deconditioned him.)

But no one knew Little Albert’s identify or his fate… until a few years ago.

2 Comments to
History of Psychology: A New Twist in the Case of Little Albert

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.

  1. would it be possible that the sound vibrations from the metal pole Watson banged on right behind Little Albert’s head caused the protective meninges to rupture leaking CSF?

  2. This article brings two things into question.

    1) Could an experiment like this ever be done nowadays? Would any ethics committee ever approve traumatizing a baby? How can these results ever be replicated?

    2) As with Sybil, these kind of where-are-they-now discoveries really bother me because of privacy and HIPAA issues. If the child had grown up and a bunch of college kids knocked on his door and asked about his rat phobias, wouldn’t that be a little intrusive?

Join the Conversation!

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.

Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)

Recent Comments
  • Judee: How interesting that this subject is being brought to light. Five decades ago, as a high school student, I...
  • Joel Hassman, MD: TOO LATE! DSM 5 is coming out with an edition for nonpsychiatrists, because the pharma lobby is...
  • Paul: I try and be as nice to myself as possible. I go to the gym regularly and am in good shape, eat well and have a...
  • EegMeister: For me as a neurofeedback practitioner, the frustration lies primarily in the notion that stimulants are...
  • Tired of Excuses: I get tired of people blaming their infidelity on ADHD, especially when they were loyal to their...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Find a Therapist


Users Online: 10187
Join Us Now!