Sallie Mae, Markel and Dewar Discriminate Against People with Mental IllnessSometimes you just have to shake your head — the more things change, the more they stay the same.

It can really be depressing to see how, 3 years after the federal mental health parity act was passed, the company known primarily for underwriting students loans — Sallie Mae — is discriminating against people with a mental illness.

It’s doing so through one of its myriad of products called tuition refund insurance, something that allows you to reclaim up to 100 percent of your tuition if an illness strikes you while you’re in school. But not just any illness — it has to be a physical illness. If a mental illness strikes you, you will only get 75 percent of your tuition returned.

There’s a silver lining on this cloud… suggesting change may be forthcoming. So here’s a blog entry to help push that change through.

9 Comments to
Sallie Mae, Markel and Dewar Discriminate Against People with Mental Illness

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.

  1. Thanks for this illuminating blog post. I had no idea discrimination like this was going on.

  2. When I read the article about Sallie Mae’s practices in the NY times it made me so mad. As someone who ended up in the hospital during my undergrad years, but luckily did not have to drop my semester, this type of discrimination makes me sick. Though it is not surprising that the schools do not force Sallie Mae and others to have nondiscriminatory practices since they often allow their student health insurance to discriminate. My current student health insurance only covers $800/year combined for mental health treatment and psychiatric medication. While you can have unlimited medication for other disorders. You can buy extra insurance if you want to, but there is a clause that says it specifically can’t be used for mental health treatment. If they wont provide fair health coverage for students who are attending their school, why would they want to provide fair treatment for those who have to drop out. For those of you who say that this should not happen because of the new parity law, most student health insurances are not group policies, but individual ones so they are under no obligation to provide parity for their students.

  3. The Markel policy doesn’t necessarily violate the MHPA because of the increased cost exemption in the MHPA.

  4. Assuming that parity between physical and mental illness is a goal, how exactly would an insurer or school control for withdrawal due to interpersonal problems with roommates, homesickness, etc.
    Clearly one visit with a mental health professional should not automatically trigger a cause for withdrawal any more than a broken leg would automatically qualify as a presumptive disability.
    Would it be OK to require either a minimum number of days of treatment and or a clearly defined set of diagnosis’ that would be considered “ disabling “

  5. A diagnosis is a diagnosis… So if a student is diagnosed with a mental disorder by a mental health professional, it qualifies them for the insurance (assuming all the other qualifications for the insurance are met).

    • would homesickness or adjustment disorders with a roomate qualify one for benefits assuming there were no other qualificaation or restrictions to receive the benefits ?

      If so, doesn’t both the school and the parents bear so responsibility for encouraging the student to use this as a life lesson rather than take the easier and less profiund route of dealing with the problem in a meaningful way

  6. I find this article interesting, as not only do I have a college-aged son with OCD, I am also a financial aid professional. In my experience with financial aid offices, they often request more documentation to verify mental health diagnoses than they do for physical health issues. I don’t have experience with the Sallie Mae insurance you write about; I am talking about the institutions own policies on refunds, remaining in good academic standing, etc. I know there are administrators who feel that there are kids who “fake” depression, etc, just so they can leave school in good standing and get their money back. The fact of the matter is that many mental health issues first manifest themselves during the college years, and these illnesses can be, at the very least, just as debilitating as physical illness. What is happening is obvious discrimination to me.

    • So how would one provide a meaningful benefit at a fair price if the insurance company needed to include the same benefits for a case of home sickness or roommate problems as compared to a student who truly had serious emotional problems?
      Covering all “mental” conditions regardless of severity would make the cost prohibitive and therefore make the benefit out of reach for those who would be potential claimants?
      As an underwriter, I’m open to suggestions for a product that is in the public interest and that would provide a reasonable benefit for a reasonable price?

  7. Dear Dr Grohol,

    Thank you for this article because I had no idea this was occuring.

    Would you please also address the fact that occupational long term disability is limited to 24 months across this country just because one has a mental health diagnosis? Companies and businesses are discriminating against mental illness and profiting from it. And the result to some is bankruptcy, loss of home or suicide.

    This discrimination occurs even though the mental health parity law was approved in 2006, it did not reach as far as disability policies.

    Please share this with your readers. Thank you.

Join the Conversation!

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.

Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)

Recent Comments
  • Upsie_Daisy: I am a middle-aged female, raised in a family of closeted gay men. I thought all nen would hate and...
  • Kat: Yes, Rhondaaa! You are so accurate with such great wise advice as I’ve experienced a very similar history....
  • James: What if someone said, “I cant get any sex”? Would they be lying to themselves?
  • Crowley: I agree, but read my note below. I’m not sure what else I could have done.
  • Crowley: My in laws were disappointed in my husband’s choice. I came from the wrong side of the tracks,...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Find a Therapist
Enter ZIP or postal code