Comments on
Health 2.0 in The Economist

By John M. Grohol, Psy.D.

Health 2.0. It’s all that people can talk about some days in the online health world. It has no definition, though, it’s not much more than the nebulous “Web 2.0,” except topic-specific.

The September 6, 2007 edition of The Economist takes a stab at its take …

-1 Comments to
Health 2.0 in The Economist

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.

  1. IVF and icsi: Most people compare the IVF to multiple births, but after seeing how controled it can be , I’d consider it to be a rather safe and effective treatment that provides qualities of both the natural birth and the arificial insemination. It’s very useful and lovely , but the person themself feels quite a bit better and safer.

Join the Conversation!

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.

Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)

Recent Comments
  • Piniewski MD: Well said. Regardless of our positions on this topic, the behavior :using Dr Google is unlikely to...
  • Starfate: I’m 61 and trying to determine the “best” way to tell my AS spouse that I’m leaving...
  • Theresa: Well I think that is a real shame. Not all therapists are so incongruent. In fact humanistic person-centred...
  • Daisy: I too am feeling the loss of a best friend. She told me that I had been treating her like s*it for the last...
  • Joyous: Gonoodle.com has short brain breaks for classroom teachers to use. I use them everyday- it really helps!
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Find a Therapist
Enter ZIP or postal code



Users Online: 10176
Join Us Now!