Comments on
Health 2.0 in The Economist

By John M. Grohol, Psy.D.

Health 2.0. It’s all that people can talk about some days in the online health world. It has no definition, though, it’s not much more than the nebulous “Web 2.0,” except topic-specific.

The September 6, 2007 edition of The Economist takes a stab at its take …

-1 Comments to
Health 2.0 in The Economist

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.

  1. IVF and icsi: Most people compare the IVF to multiple births, but after seeing how controled it can be , I’d consider it to be a rather safe and effective treatment that provides qualities of both the natural birth and the arificial insemination. It’s very useful and lovely , but the person themself feels quite a bit better and safer.

Join the Conversation!

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.

Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)

Recent Comments
  • Still Scarred: From ages 12 to 17 I had a best friend whom I didn’t realize at the time was emotionally...
  • Michael: There are some things that you can’t change no matter what you do. Life is hard sometimes it is not...
  • Toughcookeybiw: I should have known . The writing was on the walls. It really wasn’t necessary to go back. But...
  • Greg: “Greedy bastards”? My attorney charges $300/hour. My accountant $200/hour. I am in NYC, to get my...
  • Jolene Smith: I was in a mental hospital once and I can say that there is zero coffee, weak or otherwise. Also, it...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Find a Therapist
Enter ZIP or postal code



Users Online: 10162
Join Us Now!