Comments on
Health 2.0 in The Economist

By John M. Grohol, Psy.D.

Health 2.0. It’s all that people can talk about some days in the online health world. It has no definition, though, it’s not much more than the nebulous “Web 2.0,” except topic-specific.

The September 6, 2007 edition of The Economist takes a stab at its take …

-1 Comments to
Health 2.0 in The Economist

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.

  1. IVF and icsi: Most people compare the IVF to multiple births, but after seeing how controled it can be , I’d consider it to be a rather safe and effective treatment that provides qualities of both the natural birth and the arificial insemination. It’s very useful and lovely , but the person themself feels quite a bit better and safer.

Join the Conversation!

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.

Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)

Recent Comments
  • Amy: Thanks for the reminder to stay in the moments.
  • Reels: I did not know of my husbands bipolar but he always had issues with alcohol. I thought love would conquer all....
  • Reels: I did not know of my husbands bipolar but he always had issues with alcohol. I thought love would conquer all....
  • wasteofskin50: The post is not being criticized because it is offering one bad option. It is being criticized because...
  • wasteofskin50: You pretty much nailed it, Tim. The double standard that permeates every aspect of our society is so...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Find a Therapist
Enter ZIP or postal code



Users Online: 11942
Join Us Now!