Comments on
Health 2.0 in The Economist

By John M. Grohol, Psy.D.

Health 2.0. It’s all that people can talk about some days in the online health world. It has no definition, though, it’s not much more than the nebulous “Web 2.0,” except topic-specific.

The September 6, 2007 edition of The Economist takes a stab at its take …

-1 Comments to
Health 2.0 in The Economist

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.

  1. IVF and icsi: Most people compare the IVF to multiple births, but after seeing how controled it can be , I’d consider it to be a rather safe and effective treatment that provides qualities of both the natural birth and the arificial insemination. It’s very useful and lovely , but the person themself feels quite a bit better and safer.

Join the Conversation!

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.

Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)

Recent Comments
  • Stephen: It’s a shame that so many people think they can discredit a professional psychologist with their pet...
  • Girl: I am 17 and ii recently just broke up with a bf who has been with me for a couple of months, i took it quite...
  • hohum: I don’t understand why this has a focus on AS. According to wikipedia, nearly a third of marriages...
  • Nath: Hi some girl, I totally appreciate your post. I recently got engaged to someone with bipolar.. We will be...
  • Susan: thanks so much for sharing your story. i have suffered from depression since i was 17, i am now 54. i was able...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Find a Therapist
Enter ZIP or postal code



Users Online: 8690
Join Us Now!