Comments on
Health 2.0 in The Economist

By John M. Grohol, Psy.D.

Health 2.0. It’s all that people can talk about some days in the online health world. It has no definition, though, it’s not much more than the nebulous “Web 2.0,” except topic-specific.

The September 6, 2007 edition of The Economist takes a stab at its take …

-1 Comments to
Health 2.0 in The Economist

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.

  1. IVF and icsi: Most people compare the IVF to multiple births, but after seeing how controled it can be , I’d consider it to be a rather safe and effective treatment that provides qualities of both the natural birth and the arificial insemination. It’s very useful and lovely , but the person themself feels quite a bit better and safer.

Join the Conversation!

Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.

Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)

Recent Comments
  • oldblackdog: Nice summary – and simple. Simple is definitely good in trying to add a new habit It started me...
  • JoshyJ: I’ve read the article and read all of your comments. I want to thank everyone for sharing so fearlessly...
  • Darlene Lancer, LMFT: It definitely takes time to know someone in order to love them. But even then, sometimes people...
  • Nora: These things really seem to help. I have been trying a few because my anxiety levels are high. I appriciate...
  • Megalodon: Excellent article. I know those symptoms all too well. What has been interesting is that primary doctors...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Find a Therapist
Enter ZIP or postal code



Users Online: 10993
Join Us Now!