I guess “better late than never” applies to how we, as a society, treat the chronically, seriously mentally ill, and those who are typically in lower socio-economic classes.
Georgia joins the 21st century by agreeing to stop shuffling patients into its antiquated, poorly-funded state hospitals, and allowing patients instead to seek out and receive services within their own local community. This is apparently the first settlement with the federal government that invokes the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) to suggest that public inpatient psychiatric hospital care isn’t integrated within the community enough (at least in Georgia’s case).
The agreement was reached as a settlement with the federal government to give patients more choices when it comes to how they receive publicly-funded treatment for a mental illness or developmental disability. The settlement between the U.S. Department of Justice and the State of Georgia was reached on Tuesday, October 19.
The effort to move patients out of warehoused state hospitals started in the 1960s, with John F. Kennedy’s backing of a federal Community Mental Health Center model. That was nearly 50 years ago. Some states quickly adopted this new model and by the 1980s, were closing their state hospitals and moving patients into community-based care and treatment. Other states, like Georgia, have taken their old time in shuttering the ineffective state hospitals — while 130 patient deaths have been attributed to the hospitals.
Now with a little prodding from the feds, Georgia will join the 21st century in providing the typical standard of care for people with serious mental illness and developmental disabilities.
Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.
Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.
Post a Comment:
Copyright © 1995-2013 Psych Central. All rights reserved.
Site last updated: 19 Jun 2013
|
It bewildering that some can construe a settlement as the fufillment of every expectation. Here the bold claim is being made that “Georgia Mental Health Joins the 21st Century with Settlement” when nothing has yet to be realized. All will depend on the words finding their reality in subsequent deeds. Haven’t we seen enough mental health initiatives, strategic plans, and settlements become failed promises?
One need only look to New Jersey and its 2009 Olmstead settlement. Much was promised. Considerably less has been delivered. The community supports and services are a far cry from what the state had promised in 2006 pursuant to its Wellness & Recovery Transformation Statement, ” …. it is the Division’s policy to ensure that consumers and families receive a system of recovery-oriented services and resources that promote wellness, an improved quality of life and true community inclusion.” One wonders why in 2009 an Olmstead settlement was necessary when in 2006 the state “ensured” true community inclusion.
Georgia will likely meet the quantitative requirements of their Olmstead settlement but as for joining the 21st Century shouldn’t we wait for the assertion to be supported by the performance which evidences it?
Mark, that’s a good point. So many promises… Anyway, I’m not sure what other states are doing is any better. So many times patients are just medicated to the gills and stuck in group homes,which are often just as bad as psych hospitals.
Clare, Sadly in New Jersey some of those discharged from state hospitals actually end up in Residential Health Care Facilities which can be worse then New Jersey’s psychiatric hospitals. That’s saying a lot since NJ’s largest state psychiatric hospital was cited by the Department of Justice in a scathing 2009 CRIPA Report.
Too many promises, too little accountability is the hallmark of our nation’s mental health system.
Mark, I don’t doubt it. My only experience is with psych hospitals in Texas, but from what I’ve heard from patients in states with more funding those hospitals aren’t much better.
They definitely need more accountability. Patients shouldn’t have to fear being assaulted in places called hospitals, and yet many of us have had to fear that and with good reason. It just strikes me as odd that anyone would think it wise to admit patients to unsafe environments to supposedly keep them safe. Where’s the common sense?
But, I think it even goes beyond accountability. There’s a culture of disrespect that has to change as well. As long as these places believe it’s okay to deprive people with mental illness of basic human rights like right to have fresh air, sunlight, etc. then patients will continue to be treated as if they’re subhuman.
Claire,
It’s ironic that Texas was one of the first awardees of a 5 year SAMHSA State Transformation Incentive Grant in 2005 yet it doesn’t seem to be able to evidence this very transformation at the institutions it operates. Things are rarely any better elsewhere.
Connecticut’s DMHAS, “A Recovery Oriented Health Care Agency”, was also a recipient of the same 2005 SAMHSA grant. In 2007 DOJ issued its CRIPA findings on Connecticut’s largest inpatient facility, Connecticut Valley Hospital. Given your comment you will not be surprised to learn that the DOJ’s report first cites “A. PROTECTION FROM HARM” which includes “….CVH has a history of failing to protect its patients from harm”.
[DOJ CVH CRIPA Findings: http://www.justice.gov/crt/split/documents/conn_valley_hosp_findlet_8-6-07.pdf ]
The problem, repeated all over the country, is that the “community based” replacements for state hospitals never really appeared. Not consistently or effectively, that’s for sure.
So severely and persistently mentally ill people *don’t* get the help and protection that they need; they are instead dumped on families unable to cope with them, or onto the streets (at which point we call them “the homeless” and blame them on Republicans).
But at least “we” (those of us who aren’t reeling from the changes) get to feel good about ourselves that we don’t “warehouse” anymore.
Mark, I think it’s safe to say that taxpayers didn’t get their money’s worth in Texas. Evidence based practice they say? Evidence of what, I wonder? They should have spent that money on developing some hiring standards. There aren’t any standards in Texas to work in psych care. Psych techs only need a GED. That’s it, just a warm body with a GED who likes playing psychologist.
Holmegm, severely and persistently mentally ill people aren’t getting the help they need when they are being warehoused and drugged up, either, but they are tucked away out of their family’s and society’s hair so I can see where that might be the more attractive option to some. I can’t imagine anything much worse than having to spend the rest of my life drugged up in one of those dumps.