<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Debilitating Effects of TV on Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/</link>
	<description>Dr. John Grohol&#039;s daily update on all things in psychology and mental health. Since 1999.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: ahayes23</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-2/#comment-726147</link>
		<dc:creator>ahayes23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-726147</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Grohol. TV has become such a debilitating tool, that it is hard for a parent to raise their child-depending on what they are watching. And, some can say, &quot;..well, I control what my kids see on TV...&quot;, but do you REALLY? 
I don&#039;t know about you, but I cannot be there, 24/7 with my child! I suppose I could keep him/her in their rooms, under lock and key, until they turn the age of 18, but let&#039;s be realistic! Today&#039;s society, with the help of media, tv, and even the ever-so-loved, playstations, xboxes, etc., are working hard against the parent to conform our children into what the world wants them to be (or someone), and not what the American parent would like them to be! 
As a studying Clinical PSychologist, even I have troubles keeping my children &#039;away from the world&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. Grohol. TV has become such a debilitating tool, that it is hard for a parent to raise their child-depending on what they are watching. And, some can say, &#8220;..well, I control what my kids see on TV&#8230;&#8221;, but do you REALLY?<br />
I don&#8217;t know about you, but I cannot be there, 24/7 with my child! I suppose I could keep him/her in their rooms, under lock and key, until they turn the age of 18, but let&#8217;s be realistic! Today&#8217;s society, with the help of media, tv, and even the ever-so-loved, playstations, xboxes, etc., are working hard against the parent to conform our children into what the world wants them to be (or someone), and not what the American parent would like them to be!<br />
As a studying Clinical PSychologist, even I have troubles keeping my children &#8216;away from the world&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRB</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-2/#comment-726037</link>
		<dc:creator>PRB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-726037</guid>
		<description>Sorry, missed to print the youtube link. Here it is: puthttp://youtu.be/yvGhtaZhTEM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, missed to print the youtube link. Here it is: puthttp://youtu.be/yvGhtaZhTEM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRB</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-2/#comment-726036</link>
		<dc:creator>PRB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-726036</guid>
		<description>Hi all, I posted a video on youtube, summarizing the ill effects of TV. Take a look and forward it to your friends and families. A little way to help the cause.
Thanks &amp; Regards,
Pankaj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, I posted a video on youtube, summarizing the ill effects of TV. Take a look and forward it to your friends and families. A little way to help the cause.<br />
Thanks &amp; Regards,<br />
Pankaj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-1/#comment-716922</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-716922</guid>
		<description>you are correct david, however, there has been studies recently proving CAUSALITY not just correlation. look at the research done at the university of washington, outlined in a book by christakis and zimmerman called &quot;the elephant in the living room.&quot;

attempting to find flaws in the research simply to be contrary is absurd. what would be the argument FOR allowing a 18 month old to watch TV? where is ANY research (correlational or causational) which supports this behavior?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are correct david, however, there has been studies recently proving CAUSALITY not just correlation. look at the research done at the university of washington, outlined in a book by christakis and zimmerman called &#8220;the elephant in the living room.&#8221;</p>
<p>attempting to find flaws in the research simply to be contrary is absurd. what would be the argument FOR allowing a 18 month old to watch TV? where is ANY research (correlational or causational) which supports this behavior?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Martin DiMeglio</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-2/#comment-713465</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Martin DiMeglio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-713465</guid>
		<description>Television causes emotional numbness, as it is an emotional euphoric/painkiller that is tied to addiction and depression.

TV is a very significant cause of obesity. It is draining us of our energy. I have proven that TV is an extended form/experience of dream vision as waking vision. 

Also, think sensory processing and emotional disorders/impairement. Emotion is differentiated and manifest as sensory experience and feeling.
TV is highly interactive in relation to/ in conjunction with emotion, thought, attention, and memory.

TV is far worse for people than what is commonly believed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Television causes emotional numbness, as it is an emotional euphoric/painkiller that is tied to addiction and depression.</p>
<p>TV is a very significant cause of obesity. It is draining us of our energy. I have proven that TV is an extended form/experience of dream vision as waking vision. </p>
<p>Also, think sensory processing and emotional disorders/impairement. Emotion is differentiated and manifest as sensory experience and feeling.<br />
TV is highly interactive in relation to/ in conjunction with emotion, thought, attention, and memory.</p>
<p>TV is far worse for people than what is commonly believed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-2/#comment-708755</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-708755</guid>
		<description>WHAT ARE YOU WATCHING?
In the past twenty years, the morals in television shows have transformed from family life to amateur imitation. Although both provide a form of awareness, each takes a different path.  In the early 1990s, the classic hit series “Boy Meets World” was released, having children of its day watching the growth of young Cory Matthews, an average boy who faced problems with school, friends, and family. Cory is exposed to family struggles like divorce, brotherly squabbles, sex, and alcoholic abuse, all of which were family conversation the entire Mathew’s family talked about to come up with a consequence to Corey’s actions.  However, for the past ten years the generation as modified its self to reality television shows, inviting America into the daily drama of MTV’s “Jersey Shore” or the struggles of early pregnancy on ABC Family’s “The Secret Life of an American Teenager”.  The awareness of pregnancy, and struggles with friends and life are presented in two completely different ways. 
What effects does it present on the viewers? Although “Boy Meets World” viewers were shown a censored form of issues such as pregnancy, drinking, and drugs, its viewers lack the reality of life. In today’s generation, we have become more accepting of early pregnancy, and with shows like “Secret life” children are able to be exposed to such issues early on in life. The ability for them to learn about the struggles that pregnancy, drugs, and drinking have on teenager allows them to make better decisions on how to deal with such issues. Although Corey discussed with his parents the issues of alcohol, parent abuse, and sex, the total expose or reality of the situation was never to its full potential, which takes away from the views ability to understand the entirety of the situation.
Many would believe that television has no effect on their personality, the decisions they make, or the way they dress because they are their own unique individual. However, I believe that many people these days are nothing more than a diluted imitation of television characters. I believe that, as oppose to the theme of family and morals in “Boy Meets World,” television has become a sense of awareness and more informational with a dramatic twist. For instance “The Secret life of an American Teenager” shows the struggles of a young 16 year old girl in high school being pregnant.  Many parents would see this show as a life lesson that would promote the idea of safe sex, and absence. However, in the show the parents of teenager Amy Juergens, send her off to band camp where she has sex with a drummer named Ricky. After confirming that the pregnancy is true, she is forced to inform her parents. And like many parents, they are dismayed, shocked, and utterly disappointed, but by the end of episode the Juergens family decided to accept the pregnancy and work to build a better family. A clear point too many young children that if they become pregnant the end result will be acceptance. This episode takes away from the realty of such a major situation in any women’s life. In my case, if I came home pregnant at the age of 15 or 16 years old, I would have been most likely beaten, and kicked out of my house. The show takes away from the aspect of violence and reality of the issue, and substitutes it will hopeless romantic boyfriends, and supporting parents. As the seasons have continued the show has made a downward spiral in which everyone in the show is having sex, parents and students alike, and encourages marriage at a young age along with catholic children who are rebelling against Christian ways.
Megan Basham, from World Magazine wrote a review on the “Secret Life of an American Teenager” saying it “is the strongest evidence yet that the sexual content of television programs encourages adolescents to initiate sexual intercourse and other sexual activities” (Basham). I believe that shows these days cause children to imitate what is shown on television such as sex, verses try and relate to the moral of the programs to stay safe and learn from others mistakes. However, many of the shows that we find ourselves indulging in today do not have a clear message, some do not even have a message at all, that they are trying to bestow upon their viewers. Although “The Secret Life of an American Teenager,” may present the issues of pregnancy and sex in an idealistic manner, it does expose the life lesson of sex in high school to young children. At the end of each episode the main characters encourage children to confront their parents about issues such as pregnancy, anorexia, drugs, and alcohol abuse. The ability to see what these issues really do and the struggles teens have to face allows proper exposure to these concepts. On the other hand, the “Boy Meets World” strategy leaves children naive and unable to take the right actions when confronted with such issues. Although the thought of never being exposed to something sounds better, children are able to examine the consequences of life changing actions through television.
Watching my older sister as I grew up, I was able to understand where her conservative side of her personality comes from. Like many children, we were only allowed to watch television, we were not allowed to go to the movies, the mall, or sleepovers with friends, my parents were very strict about the things they would allow us to do. My family has become more liberal than they once were, and have become more lenient towards me and my younger sister. Parenting and family play a key role in the outcome of children, but parents are outnumbered on the amount of conversations they may have with their children as they grow up, and the amount of television programs they encounter. My sisters are a prime example of this concept. My older sister is very conservative when picking clothing, realistic when making decisions with money, and understanding of both sides of a story. My younger sister on the other hand is mostly the exact opposite, she enjoys pounding on tons of makeup, showing of her assets, and very outspoken usually curing after every word. Many psychologists have studied the comparisons between the oldest and youngest children to determine what behavioral effects are associated with each position within the family. Linda Musun Baskett from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock experimented on the ordinal position differences within family interactions, and came to the conclusion that “the greater conformity and lesser popularity of oldest children could be the result of greater contact with parents than with siblings and could result because first-born children experience more negative responses from others. Lastborn children&#039;s alternations between interactions with adults and peers within the family could result in well-developed social skills, whereas fewer negative responses from others could be tied to less social anxiety” (Baskett, 1030). We are able to see that even though the first child in many families is an experiment child, they remain in close content with family traditions and ethics, as oppose to the youngest who is pampered with attention and feeds off their curiosity as a social butterfly.  

Psychologists believe that television has a strong correlation with the behavior of children. The famous behaviorism psychologist, Albert Bandura experimented on children and their behavior as they watch the positive and negative reinforcements of others. The experiment he carried out showed children a video of a model punch, kick, and shouting various hostile phrases at the bobo-doll. In one video the children were shown the model being positively rewarded after beating up the bobo-doll, the other video showed the model being punished for her behavior. The children who watched the positively reinforced model were later caught imitating the behavior they had seen. Bandura social learning theory is known as the observational learning model. Robert A. Baron, discuses in his article “Aggression,” the ideas behind Bandura, and how “children learn to act aggressive when they model their behavior after violent acts of adults, especially family members. For example, the boy who witnesses his father repeatedly strikes his mother, will more than likely to become an abusive parent and husband” (Isom). This theory of Bandura goes hand in hand with my assumption of how television advocates the imitation in child behavior. According to Bandura’s research as television becomes more blunt, so will the society it broadcast to, thus fading morals and changing norms.
“Teachers and school officials claim that children bring to school what they hear at home, whereas parents insist that children bring home what they hear in school,” much like the saying which came first the chicken or the egg, no one can really say (Kaye, 431-432). Children of this day and age are surrounded by the concept of reality television shows. The humiliation of others entertains us so much, that many girls want nothing more than to pound on the makeup, dress skanky, and talk like a bimbo from the “Jersey Shore” or a stuck up snooty brat with lots of money from MTV’S  “My Super Sweet 16”. Most of my younger sister’s generation has no respect for their elders, money, or even appreciation for themselves. It is always wise to remember when it comes to television “children are not passive recipients of televised information–a view that is in contrast with that of many social critics–but bring their own experience, knowledge, and abilities to the viewing situation” (Rolandelli, 49-50). It is reasonable to say that all girls go through a stage where imitation is one of the many steps towards growing up, and understand who they are. Others would say that parents are totally to blame for the way girls grow up. Both are valid assumptions, but with television and society turning towards sex and appearance, the values of my younger sisters generation are more likely to worry about how they will fit in. This need to fit in and imitation of what is seen on television may cause hasty decisions on sex, drugs, and alcohol in order to gain approval from their peers.
In today’s society, being older than what you are is a key concept as everyone is in a rush to experience things much earlier in life. For instance the younger generation is already wearing makeup at an early age, drinking at an early age, even having sex at an early age. The lack of morals has changed not only in our society but on the television shows viewers watch today. A decade ago, the generation was more prone to playing it safe, with shows like “Boy Meets World” verses the curious immature child of today, who engage themselves in shows such as “Jersey Shore” and “Secret Life of an American Teenager”. Where did the morals in society go, and what is with the pointless television shows about sex, drugs, and violence trying to advocate to the viewers. I cannot seem to understand why television has become such a downward spiral of disrespect, cursing, and lack of ethics.  What will be in store for future generations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT ARE YOU WATCHING?<br />
In the past twenty years, the morals in television shows have transformed from family life to amateur imitation. Although both provide a form of awareness, each takes a different path.  In the early 1990s, the classic hit series “Boy Meets World” was released, having children of its day watching the growth of young Cory Matthews, an average boy who faced problems with school, friends, and family. Cory is exposed to family struggles like divorce, brotherly squabbles, sex, and alcoholic abuse, all of which were family conversation the entire Mathew’s family talked about to come up with a consequence to Corey’s actions.  However, for the past ten years the generation as modified its self to reality television shows, inviting America into the daily drama of MTV’s “Jersey Shore” or the struggles of early pregnancy on ABC Family’s “The Secret Life of an American Teenager”.  The awareness of pregnancy, and struggles with friends and life are presented in two completely different ways.<br />
What effects does it present on the viewers? Although “Boy Meets World” viewers were shown a censored form of issues such as pregnancy, drinking, and drugs, its viewers lack the reality of life. In today’s generation, we have become more accepting of early pregnancy, and with shows like “Secret life” children are able to be exposed to such issues early on in life. The ability for them to learn about the struggles that pregnancy, drugs, and drinking have on teenager allows them to make better decisions on how to deal with such issues. Although Corey discussed with his parents the issues of alcohol, parent abuse, and sex, the total expose or reality of the situation was never to its full potential, which takes away from the views ability to understand the entirety of the situation.<br />
Many would believe that television has no effect on their personality, the decisions they make, or the way they dress because they are their own unique individual. However, I believe that many people these days are nothing more than a diluted imitation of television characters. I believe that, as oppose to the theme of family and morals in “Boy Meets World,” television has become a sense of awareness and more informational with a dramatic twist. For instance “The Secret life of an American Teenager” shows the struggles of a young 16 year old girl in high school being pregnant.  Many parents would see this show as a life lesson that would promote the idea of safe sex, and absence. However, in the show the parents of teenager Amy Juergens, send her off to band camp where she has sex with a drummer named Ricky. After confirming that the pregnancy is true, she is forced to inform her parents. And like many parents, they are dismayed, shocked, and utterly disappointed, but by the end of episode the Juergens family decided to accept the pregnancy and work to build a better family. A clear point too many young children that if they become pregnant the end result will be acceptance. This episode takes away from the realty of such a major situation in any women’s life. In my case, if I came home pregnant at the age of 15 or 16 years old, I would have been most likely beaten, and kicked out of my house. The show takes away from the aspect of violence and reality of the issue, and substitutes it will hopeless romantic boyfriends, and supporting parents. As the seasons have continued the show has made a downward spiral in which everyone in the show is having sex, parents and students alike, and encourages marriage at a young age along with catholic children who are rebelling against Christian ways.<br />
Megan Basham, from World Magazine wrote a review on the “Secret Life of an American Teenager” saying it “is the strongest evidence yet that the sexual content of television programs encourages adolescents to initiate sexual intercourse and other sexual activities” (Basham). I believe that shows these days cause children to imitate what is shown on television such as sex, verses try and relate to the moral of the programs to stay safe and learn from others mistakes. However, many of the shows that we find ourselves indulging in today do not have a clear message, some do not even have a message at all, that they are trying to bestow upon their viewers. Although “The Secret Life of an American Teenager,” may present the issues of pregnancy and sex in an idealistic manner, it does expose the life lesson of sex in high school to young children. At the end of each episode the main characters encourage children to confront their parents about issues such as pregnancy, anorexia, drugs, and alcohol abuse. The ability to see what these issues really do and the struggles teens have to face allows proper exposure to these concepts. On the other hand, the “Boy Meets World” strategy leaves children naive and unable to take the right actions when confronted with such issues. Although the thought of never being exposed to something sounds better, children are able to examine the consequences of life changing actions through television.<br />
Watching my older sister as I grew up, I was able to understand where her conservative side of her personality comes from. Like many children, we were only allowed to watch television, we were not allowed to go to the movies, the mall, or sleepovers with friends, my parents were very strict about the things they would allow us to do. My family has become more liberal than they once were, and have become more lenient towards me and my younger sister. Parenting and family play a key role in the outcome of children, but parents are outnumbered on the amount of conversations they may have with their children as they grow up, and the amount of television programs they encounter. My sisters are a prime example of this concept. My older sister is very conservative when picking clothing, realistic when making decisions with money, and understanding of both sides of a story. My younger sister on the other hand is mostly the exact opposite, she enjoys pounding on tons of makeup, showing of her assets, and very outspoken usually curing after every word. Many psychologists have studied the comparisons between the oldest and youngest children to determine what behavioral effects are associated with each position within the family. Linda Musun Baskett from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock experimented on the ordinal position differences within family interactions, and came to the conclusion that “the greater conformity and lesser popularity of oldest children could be the result of greater contact with parents than with siblings and could result because first-born children experience more negative responses from others. Lastborn children&#8217;s alternations between interactions with adults and peers within the family could result in well-developed social skills, whereas fewer negative responses from others could be tied to less social anxiety” (Baskett, 1030). We are able to see that even though the first child in many families is an experiment child, they remain in close content with family traditions and ethics, as oppose to the youngest who is pampered with attention and feeds off their curiosity as a social butterfly.  </p>
<p>Psychologists believe that television has a strong correlation with the behavior of children. The famous behaviorism psychologist, Albert Bandura experimented on children and their behavior as they watch the positive and negative reinforcements of others. The experiment he carried out showed children a video of a model punch, kick, and shouting various hostile phrases at the bobo-doll. In one video the children were shown the model being positively rewarded after beating up the bobo-doll, the other video showed the model being punished for her behavior. The children who watched the positively reinforced model were later caught imitating the behavior they had seen. Bandura social learning theory is known as the observational learning model. Robert A. Baron, discuses in his article “Aggression,” the ideas behind Bandura, and how “children learn to act aggressive when they model their behavior after violent acts of adults, especially family members. For example, the boy who witnesses his father repeatedly strikes his mother, will more than likely to become an abusive parent and husband” (Isom). This theory of Bandura goes hand in hand with my assumption of how television advocates the imitation in child behavior. According to Bandura’s research as television becomes more blunt, so will the society it broadcast to, thus fading morals and changing norms.<br />
“Teachers and school officials claim that children bring to school what they hear at home, whereas parents insist that children bring home what they hear in school,” much like the saying which came first the chicken or the egg, no one can really say (Kaye, 431-432). Children of this day and age are surrounded by the concept of reality television shows. The humiliation of others entertains us so much, that many girls want nothing more than to pound on the makeup, dress skanky, and talk like a bimbo from the “Jersey Shore” or a stuck up snooty brat with lots of money from MTV’S  “My Super Sweet 16”. Most of my younger sister’s generation has no respect for their elders, money, or even appreciation for themselves. It is always wise to remember when it comes to television “children are not passive recipients of televised information–a view that is in contrast with that of many social critics–but bring their own experience, knowledge, and abilities to the viewing situation” (Rolandelli, 49-50). It is reasonable to say that all girls go through a stage where imitation is one of the many steps towards growing up, and understand who they are. Others would say that parents are totally to blame for the way girls grow up. Both are valid assumptions, but with television and society turning towards sex and appearance, the values of my younger sisters generation are more likely to worry about how they will fit in. This need to fit in and imitation of what is seen on television may cause hasty decisions on sex, drugs, and alcohol in order to gain approval from their peers.<br />
In today’s society, being older than what you are is a key concept as everyone is in a rush to experience things much earlier in life. For instance the younger generation is already wearing makeup at an early age, drinking at an early age, even having sex at an early age. The lack of morals has changed not only in our society but on the television shows viewers watch today. A decade ago, the generation was more prone to playing it safe, with shows like “Boy Meets World” verses the curious immature child of today, who engage themselves in shows such as “Jersey Shore” and “Secret Life of an American Teenager”. Where did the morals in society go, and what is with the pointless television shows about sex, drugs, and violence trying to advocate to the viewers. I cannot seem to understand why television has become such a downward spiral of disrespect, cursing, and lack of ethics.  What will be in store for future generations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-2/#comment-704092</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-704092</guid>
		<description>I think cutting off a child from their peers is exactly what is needed seeing as how my own peers in high school were taught by tv and radio that smart is dumb and dumb is cool.  I remember sitting in my economics class and having a discussion with the teacher about the lesson while 25 brain dead zombies in the surrounding desks either couldn&#039;t or wouldn&#039;t participate in the class because that would have been a major social flub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think cutting off a child from their peers is exactly what is needed seeing as how my own peers in high school were taught by tv and radio that smart is dumb and dumb is cool.  I remember sitting in my economics class and having a discussion with the teacher about the lesson while 25 brain dead zombies in the surrounding desks either couldn&#8217;t or wouldn&#8217;t participate in the class because that would have been a major social flub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amira</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-2/#comment-702103</link>
		<dc:creator>Amira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 02:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-702103</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how there are so many articles and studies done on the negative effects of TV on children, and yet none on the positive effects. Discussing TV shows and movies is common among children, and cutting your child off could simultaneously cut them off from their peers. Children also bond over new fashion fads or toy crazes that they see in commercials. And of course, television is useful in teaching children social skills. It&#039;s critical that children know how to behave around their peers and how to socialize appropriately. Raising your children without television would be to cut them off from what&#039;s going on in the world around them, rendering them socially awkward. My sister&#039;s classmate was raised without television, and this girl could barely function in a social setting. She would make the most inappropriate comments at all the wrong moments. She tried to talk about what she had learned in her Bug Encyclopedia when the other girls were talking about Kelly Clarkson&#039;s outfit in her newest music video. Children who grow up like that are generally excluded and are always different from the other children. As a parent, ask yourself if what you really want is for your child to be so different from, and have so little in common to his or her peers. 

However, I agree that parents should be more focused on their child&#039;s education than they currently are. Instead of attempting to restrict TV and create other stimulating activities for their children to do, parents should be more firm when it comes to their childrens&#039; schoolwork. My parents were no-nonsense when it came to school. I could watch television, but that report card needed to be all A&#039;s. I learned from a very early age how to manage my time effectively. I knew that there was a certain amount of time that needed to be alloted to fractions and decimals or else my grade would suffer. I also knew that after I studied, TV was a great way to relax and my parents wouldn&#039;t chase after me saying &quot;Turn of the TV, let&#039;s go for a nature hike or build with legos.&quot; Creativity and imagination is great and all, but academic success is key. When I raise my own kids, I&#039;ll make sure they know that schoolwork is more important above all, but I won&#039;t hackle them with &quot;creative projects&quot; when all they want to do is relax after hours of studying. And really, what&#039;s the harm in a couple hours of low-key entertainment and relaxation after all the homework is done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how there are so many articles and studies done on the negative effects of TV on children, and yet none on the positive effects. Discussing TV shows and movies is common among children, and cutting your child off could simultaneously cut them off from their peers. Children also bond over new fashion fads or toy crazes that they see in commercials. And of course, television is useful in teaching children social skills. It&#8217;s critical that children know how to behave around their peers and how to socialize appropriately. Raising your children without television would be to cut them off from what&#8217;s going on in the world around them, rendering them socially awkward. My sister&#8217;s classmate was raised without television, and this girl could barely function in a social setting. She would make the most inappropriate comments at all the wrong moments. She tried to talk about what she had learned in her Bug Encyclopedia when the other girls were talking about Kelly Clarkson&#8217;s outfit in her newest music video. Children who grow up like that are generally excluded and are always different from the other children. As a parent, ask yourself if what you really want is for your child to be so different from, and have so little in common to his or her peers. </p>
<p>However, I agree that parents should be more focused on their child&#8217;s education than they currently are. Instead of attempting to restrict TV and create other stimulating activities for their children to do, parents should be more firm when it comes to their childrens&#8217; schoolwork. My parents were no-nonsense when it came to school. I could watch television, but that report card needed to be all A&#8217;s. I learned from a very early age how to manage my time effectively. I knew that there was a certain amount of time that needed to be alloted to fractions and decimals or else my grade would suffer. I also knew that after I studied, TV was a great way to relax and my parents wouldn&#8217;t chase after me saying &#8220;Turn of the TV, let&#8217;s go for a nature hike or build with legos.&#8221; Creativity and imagination is great and all, but academic success is key. When I raise my own kids, I&#8217;ll make sure they know that schoolwork is more important above all, but I won&#8217;t hackle them with &#8220;creative projects&#8221; when all they want to do is relax after hours of studying. And really, what&#8217;s the harm in a couple hours of low-key entertainment and relaxation after all the homework is done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshelyn Cleckler</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-2/#comment-692897</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshelyn Cleckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-692897</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t watch TV that much.  Because it have so much stuff that childeren shouldn&#039;t be watching and they need to spend all their time reading and writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch TV that much.  Because it have so much stuff that childeren shouldn&#8217;t be watching and they need to spend all their time reading and writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-1/#comment-692736</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-692736</guid>
		<description>The way I feel about children and T.V. is; Children have young growing minds and the more they hear,watch, and pick up on the more the mind grows and the curosity of the child begins. They stuff put on television shows today only corrupt the young minds of our children.Its to much violence and things young minds don&#039;t need to be introduced to.I am a mother of three and I watch what my children are exposed to because I want my kids to focus on there education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I feel about children and T.V. is; Children have young growing minds and the more they hear,watch, and pick up on the more the mind grows and the curosity of the child begins. They stuff put on television shows today only corrupt the young minds of our children.Its to much violence and things young minds don&#8217;t need to be introduced to.I am a mother of three and I watch what my children are exposed to because I want my kids to focus on there education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latice</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-1/#comment-672329</link>
		<dc:creator>Latice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-672329</guid>
		<description>I would like to say thank you for writing this article and also doing the research on it. TV is different today because it has been remastered and its level of getting our attention has been changed. Children today are not aware of what is out there, things like subliminal messages that target the unconscious mind. Children today are not being taught what to look for in regards to watching the tube. I agree totally with you. I agree that the children will become over weight, they will have high cholesterol, and they will not do as welll as other children if constantly being exposed to the tube for long periods of time. Television in some cases are poison to children&#039;s feeble, spongue type minds. On television, there are some good programns for them to watch but they have to be trained what to watch and how often to watch television. Children are reminded repeatedly about eating things that are not good for them such as sweets, fast foods, and junk food. The television shows commercials about drugs all the way to different types of life styles, so I feel that the television is harmful because they are being taught about things that are irrelavant to their growth,they are all being exposed to situations at an early age, and things that they should not be involved in. `</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to say thank you for writing this article and also doing the research on it. TV is different today because it has been remastered and its level of getting our attention has been changed. Children today are not aware of what is out there, things like subliminal messages that target the unconscious mind. Children today are not being taught what to look for in regards to watching the tube. I agree totally with you. I agree that the children will become over weight, they will have high cholesterol, and they will not do as welll as other children if constantly being exposed to the tube for long periods of time. Television in some cases are poison to children&#8217;s feeble, spongue type minds. On television, there are some good programns for them to watch but they have to be trained what to watch and how often to watch television. Children are reminded repeatedly about eating things that are not good for them such as sweets, fast foods, and junk food. The television shows commercials about drugs all the way to different types of life styles, so I feel that the television is harmful because they are being taught about things that are irrelavant to their growth,they are all being exposed to situations at an early age, and things that they should not be involved in. `</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twalker38</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-1/#comment-665673</link>
		<dc:creator>Twalker38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-665673</guid>
		<description>I too grew up with a TV in our home but I truly can&#039;t say that it was the &quot;only&quot; sourse of my problems as a troubled adolesent.I feel that watching my parents fight all the time, and peer preasure growing up were my biggest factors in my negative behavior problems.How you are raised is a big factor,sure...but as we grow older we know right from wrong and we all make our own choices in life!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too grew up with a TV in our home but I truly can&#8217;t say that it was the &#8220;only&#8221; sourse of my problems as a troubled adolesent.I feel that watching my parents fight all the time, and peer preasure growing up were my biggest factors in my negative behavior problems.How you are raised is a big factor,sure&#8230;but as we grow older we know right from wrong and we all make our own choices in life!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine Dobbins</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-1/#comment-665497</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine Dobbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 02:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-665497</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, I think with supervision and by all means monitoring your child&#039;s viewing is a must. There&#039;s many great educational shows on TV that will have a positive impact on children. With tecnology today you can ommit certain channels and video viewing is the parents decision on what&#039;s allowed or not for their children. The consequence of parents actions to regulate TV watching for their children will result in a positive or negative outcome. Monitor, and supervise them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, I think with supervision and by all means monitoring your child&#8217;s viewing is a must. There&#8217;s many great educational shows on TV that will have a positive impact on children. With tecnology today you can ommit certain channels and video viewing is the parents decision on what&#8217;s allowed or not for their children. The consequence of parents actions to regulate TV watching for their children will result in a positive or negative outcome. Monitor, and supervise them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Williams</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-1/#comment-664989</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-664989</guid>
		<description>I have an eight year old who spend about an hour in front of the television set. That hour I think is not good for her. She isn&#039;t focused on any one particular thing her mind races.She doesn&#039;t keep still one minute she&#039;s one place the next minute she&#039;s in another place. she&#039;s been diagnose with ADHD &amp; ADD.That one hour of television has affected her tremendously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an eight year old who spend about an hour in front of the television set. That hour I think is not good for her. She isn&#8217;t focused on any one particular thing her mind races.She doesn&#8217;t keep still one minute she&#8217;s one place the next minute she&#8217;s in another place. she&#8217;s been diagnose with ADHD &amp; ADD.That one hour of television has affected her tremendously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Pugh</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/09/27/the-debilitating-effects-of-tv-on-children/comment-page-1/#comment-643462</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Pugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=6029#comment-643462</guid>
		<description>I noted that only 1 in 6 had an open mind on the subject as I understand it. The other 5 were fairly sure of what they saw and wanted the article to state. I think &quot; no TV whatever&quot; would possibly make for a less rounded person, however I do agree that TV should be monitored in children and teens. Even adults should be aware of their time involved in TV to the exclusion of other more productive things.

Anthony Pugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noted that only 1 in 6 had an open mind on the subject as I understand it. The other 5 were fairly sure of what they saw and wanted the article to state. I think &#8221; no TV whatever&#8221; would possibly make for a less rounded person, however I do agree that TV should be monitored in children and teens. Even adults should be aware of their time involved in TV to the exclusion of other more productive things.</p>
<p>Anthony Pugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/23 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 525/533 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: g.psychcentral.com

Served from: psychcentral.com @ 2012-02-14 18:19:58 -->
