While visiting family over the weekend, I thought you might enjoy these classic entries from our past.
10 Years Ago on Psych Central
- When Tragedy Provides
My essay about the Columbine tragedy, which also just celebrated its 10 year anniversary a few months ago. Tragedy reminds us that we’re human and gives us a chance to reconnect with one another. But nothing can make sense of tragedies such as Columbine.
5 Years Ago on Psych Central
- Drug Maker Acknowledges Misleading Claims
In case you thought that some pharmaceutical companies’ recent problems with telling the whole truth about their drugs is something new, I noted 5 years ago when Janssen admitted that it minimized some of the potential side effects of its drug, Risperdal. According to the story, “the FDA determined that the company’s promotional materials still minimized the risk of strokes, diabetes and other potentially fatal complications. The agency also said Janssen made misleading claims that the medication was safer in treating mental illness than similar drugs.” The more things change…
- Caught in the WebForeshadowing the rise of the non-existent disorder, “Internet addiction,” this entry noted how some soldiers in Finland were having a hard time being away from the Internet and got their military service time decreased. Why wouldn’t that work for TV?
1 Year Ago on Psych Central
- One Year Medication-Free with Bipolar Disorder
We noted the anniversary of when blogger extraordinaire Philip Dawdy over at Furious Seasons marked his one year anniversary medication-free while living with bipolar disorder. His brief second year followup here, where he says he no longer has bipolar disorder:
So two years after my psychiatrist talked me into going off the last of 18 years of psych meds, my case establishes one of four things: that I was a bad diagnosis back in 1989 and was never bipolar at all; that bipolar disorder burns out over time; that I’m a medical miracle of some kind; or, that I am a sick, delusional man, soon to be hospitalized.
- Another Brain Fad for Depression?A love letter to neuroscientists was published in the Boston Globe which caught my BS-alert detector. Just a ridiculous, one-sided article suggesting that only a biological understanding of mental illness will result in the golden age of treatment. Meanwhile, hundreds of psychological studies are published each and every year on different psychological treatments and theories of mental disorders. Few get noticed because psychological explanations are so… boring compared to the pretty, compelling pictures of fMRI, for instance.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Comments to
“Friday Flashback for July 24, 2009”
John, I will only comment on one subject, and this is about what you wrote in your post: ‘When Tragedy Provides’.
First, the following. I am currently reading a book, (and I read most of my books on CD, or tape, while driving) by Walley Lamb, ‘The Hour I First Believed’. I had no idea this was all about the the ‘Columbine tragedy’, and it really throws the reader deeply….
Also, I live in Eugene, OR, and we had a major High School shooting here, in Springfield, (Twin City right next door) I believe not long before the Columbine one. A kid first murdered his parents and then starting his killing spree at the school. (Kip Kinkel) So, I was close to that one.
and, I just want to point out, that I do find it very suspicious that all and every one of these kids who murdered was on an anti-depressant. (One of the kids from Columbine HS was on Luvox, and this same drug turned my son bipolar, and my entire family lived in fear and hell for something like 6-7 years)
The moment the Luvox was discontinued, my son never again had even a single symptom of manic depressive illness, and he never did before the drug was started.
Second, I wanted to comment on some stuff you talk about in the article. I am not saying I am right and you are wrong, but I do feel a strong sense about wanting to comment about my thoughts and that are different from yours re: tragedy. (so, please take what’s useful and throw out the rest) I am not invested in being right, but I do know what ’such experience’ had done for/with me.
John: “But tragedy does know one thing — how to provide. Whether we choose or not and what we choose to take back from tragedy is up to us.”
I do not agree with you that we choose, and that it is up to us at all. In my case, the ‘long term’ outcome was very much like you talk about, but I never chose anything, and I never engaged in ‘positive thinking’. For me, I literally had to ‘die’, again and again, in so many ways, fall so very deep, and to a place that I had absolutely no control over, or choice. My point is that I think ‘ecstasy’ and ‘agony’ belong together.
I would never voluntarily chose to go through an ordeal like the one I went through, and I am really glad I did not know ahead of time just how bad things would get.
But I had to fall into such agony to be who i am today, and no ‘positive self talk’, and ‘rationalizing’ could have touched me even close to such level that I now know, and am. I will never be the same person as I was, but I am glad I am who I am now.
John says: “I doubt this could provide comfort to anyone who has experienced tragedy on such an epic scale as this one.”
You don’t know that, John. There is no ‘objective’ grief and suffering, and only ‘the person him/herself’ can tell you what this meant to them. Also, the very ’something’ that we tend to believe is the ‘meat of a tragedy’ is rarely such. there is so much more and other involved.
John: ‘You don’t have to wait until tragedy strikes your life.’
No, you don’t have to stop and wait, but do not assume that you will ever be prepared for when tragedy strikes, and your reaction or response to it, because you don’t know, you can only believe…
Katrin (thanks for letting me say this and for listening, at least I hope?)
(not edited)
I see that the first comment to this post disappeared.
Is there a way you can erase, or take back, your own comments?
Thanks, Katrin (although, from this author, I do not expect an answer, or even acknowledgment, never mind feedback on anything I may say, and ask about)
Giving feedback is a ‘gift’, not a ‘requirement’.
Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 23 Jul 2009






