Those pseudo-inspirational workplace posters annoy me. You know the kind I’m talking about — the ones that say “SUCCESS” and “ENDURANCE” in all caps below some nature-themed stock photography surrounded by a thick black border? Yeah. They’re all over my office, and they’re probably all over yours, too. (I think they multiply after everyone in the office leaves for the evening.)
The more I look at the “AIM HIGH” poster — the one with a mean-looking eagle careening through the sky — the less I feel like aiming high. And the more I feel like creating online parodies of these ubiquitous workplace posters. (Try it; it’s fun.)
Why do these posters annoy us so much? Do these ultra-positive messages actually increase our self-esteem? Well, probably not. According to a paper recently published in Psychological Science (“Positive Self-Statements: Power for Some, Peril for Others”), these types of positive messages can actually make you feel worse.
The study didn’t revolve around these posters; rather, it looked exclusively at positive self-talk. Self-talk is a form of intrapersonal communication, or communication within oneself, in which you’re both the sender and the receiver of the message. Telling yourself that you’re a good dancer, a bad speller, a kind friend, or a sore loser means that you’re engaging in self-talk. It sounds logical that positive self-talk would reinforce your positive attributes — after all, if I’m feeling down and I combat it by telling myself that I’m a confident person, then wouldn’t I start to feel better about myself and consequently begin displaying even more confidence? Wouldn’t I just become a veritable machine of ever-looping confidence? I toyed with these thoughts after I read Dr. John Grohol’s post about this very study.
About that personal confidence machine I dreamed up in the preceding paragraph: not so likely, according to researchers Wood, Perunovic, & Lee. Like Dr. John noted last week, they found that individuals (who have low self-esteem to begin with) reported feeling worse — yes, not merely unchanged, but worse! — after engaging in an exercise that involved positive self-talk. John Cloud of TIME.com wrote up a concise summary of the researcher’s findings:
Wood, Lee and Perunovic conclude that unfavorable thoughts about ourselves intrude very easily, especially among those of us with low self-esteem — so easily and so persistently that even when a positive alternative is presented, it just underlines how awful we believe we are.
What does this conclusion tell us? Well, it puts forth the idea that positive self-talk isn’t so positive after all. If I tell myself that I am a friendly person, then I might paradoxically become more aware of the ways in which I am NOT a friendly person. I might remember how I flipped off that serial lane-changer on the way home from work yesterday in suburban Philly rush hour. I might recall that snarky comment I muttered once while I was on hold for the seventeenth time with Verizon’s customer service department. I might begin to ruminate about how I rarely extend a courteous hello to my co-workers when I arrive at work in the morning because I’m tired and still in that post-sleep haze. Yeah. All of the above is true, and I suddenly don’t feel all that friendly. Sounds like positive self-talk defeats the purpose, right?
But maybe not. Let’s take a look at the manner in which they conducted the research, according to Cloud:
…Wood, Lee and Perunovic measured 68 students on their self-esteem. The students were then asked to write down their thoughts and feelings for four minutes. Every 15 seconds during those four minutes, one randomly assigned group of the students heard a bell. When they heard it, they were supposed to tell themselves, “I am a lovable person.”
Good news for the fans of positive self-talk: there are some definite limitations with the above methodology, so we have to interpret its results with caution. Yes, the sample size is very small and made up of college students (who aren’t typically representative of the population at large). But there are some bigger validity concerns here. (And all good research studies seem to produce more questions than answers.)
First, the students were told to repeat “I am a lovable person” at the sound of a bell. Now, how often have YOU personally engaged in positive self-talk at pre-determined intervals like that? Self-talk (of either the positive or negative type) seems to happen when we’re organically thinking about the situation at hand — not when a researcher prompts you to. This act of self-talk in the study is quite removed from a real-life scenario in which positive self-talk would be useful; thus, the study’s results tell us a lot about what happens when people with low self-esteem are TOLD to use positive-self talk at specific intervals. Unfortunately, it tells us little about what happens when people with low self-esteem use positive self-talk on their own accord when the occasion calls for it.
Second, do these short “bursts” of self-talk described in the study differ in any way from the duration of the self-talk that we engage in during our daily lives? I think they do differ quite dramatically. Perhaps our real-life self-talk sessions last longer than just a moment or two, and maybe longer sessions are more effective. Maybe it takes some time and contemplation to fully sell yourself on the idea that you’re beautiful or lovable or intelligent. If so, then the study’s results should be applied with caution to actual instances of positive self-talk that’s longer in duration.
Third, I think conviction is an important element in successful positive self-talk. Did the participants in the study feel a sense of conviction about the self-talk messages they were instructed to repeat to themselves? If you’re told to internally proclaim that you’re a lovable person, it’s easy to send that message to yourself on autopilot and without much meaning. On the other hand, if you feel personally compelled — thanks to a meaningful life situation — to internally proclaim that you’re a lovable person, wouldn’t you be a stronger believer of that very message? We can persuade others more easily when we believe what we’re saying; so, doesn’t it make sense that we can persuade ourselves in the same way?
The folks who can benefit the most from a self-esteem boost are those with low self-esteem. I don’t think positive self-talk will always make those with low self-esteem feel worse (even though I can’t say the same for the effects of those inspirational posters). But perhaps it’s best to engage in it on your own accord — with your own conviction, when the time feels right, and for a duration that’s longer than just a brief burst. Do it meaningfully.
Does positive self-talk work for you? If so, does it work in some situations and not in others? Why do you think so? Sound off in the comments.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Links to This Article
New Findings on Difficulties in Re-Programming Yourself (7/9/2009)
Positivt tänkande kan göra dig olyckligare « trollhare (7/10/2009)
5 Comments to
“Got Low Self-Esteem? Don’t Ditch the Positive Self-Talk Just Yet”
Great post, Summer
For me, self-talk tends to work best when I’m “aggressive” about it. For example, if I’m feeling particularly down, just saying to myself “I’m a good person” or “I’m a nice person” or “I’m a talented person” does not get the job done. (Why? Because I’m also very aware that it’s just self-talk and of what it’s supposed to do, so that kind of defeats the purpose for me.)
However, if – while I’m saying/thinking one of those things or some variation of one of those things – I also smile, laugh, remember a time that “proves” one of those things, the results are usually better.
And, then, there are times when I just need to give myself a swift kick
Thanks Alicia!
What you said in the first paragraph of your comment got me thinking today — the phrase used in the study was “I am a loveable person”. The phrases that you used above are “I’m a good person”; “I’m a nice person”; “I’m a talented person”. All of the above begin with “I am”. Maybe self-talk if more effective when it implies action: “I treat others nicely” or “I write and sing well”. Or maybe when it’s more specific. Or maybe when you give it a reason (“I am a good person because I enjoy helping people”).
I like the reason-based theory. It makes a lot of sense to me, given that providing evidence is a good way to persuade others. And if I remember correctly, Robert Cialdini wrote in “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion” something about how we can persuade others just by using the word “because” — even if the argument that follows the “because” is fairly weak. If I weren’t at work right now — surrounded by these fantastic motivational posters — I’d grab my Cialdini book and give you a better citation!
“We can persuade others more easily when we believe what we’re saying; so, doesn’t it make sense that we can persuade ourselves in the same way?”
Good point! Now I know how to answer when I am scold about not thinking enough positive about myself!
“I like the reason-based theory”
Thank you, Summer!
This is false, everything you tell yourself you believe in some degree.
This is all very interesting to me. I have been researching positive self talk for the day and I believe that it is beast to do it only when you believe it to be true. If I hate myself then telling myself that “I am lovable” will just make me feel worse, but if I tell myself that I did a good job on something that I know I did a good job on than I am less likely to feel so bad about myself.
Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 8 Jul 2009







