<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientific American: Let&#8217;s Stretch Research to Make it Sexy!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/</link>
	<description>Dr. John Grohol&#039;s daily update on all things in psychology and mental health. Since 1999.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Men&#8217;s Game &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2008-06-13 Spike activity</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-523265</link>
		<dc:creator>Men&#8217;s Game &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2008-06-13 Spike activity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-523265</guid>
		<description>[...] PsychCentral has a wonderful bit of detective work showing the Scientific American just replaced &#8216;writing&#8217; with &#8216;blogging&#8217; to re-release an article entitled &#8216;Blogging: Itâs Good for You&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PsychCentral has a wonderful bit of detective work showing the Scientific American just replaced &#8216;writing&#8217; with &#8216;blogging&#8217; to re-release an article entitled &#8216;Blogging: Itâs Good for You&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2008-06-13 Spike activity &#124; Psychology Blog</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-517472</link>
		<dc:creator>2008-06-13 Spike activity &#124; Psychology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-517472</guid>
		<description>[...] PsychCentral has a wonderful bit of detective work showing the Scientific American just replaced &#8216;writing&#8217; with &#8216;blogging&#8217; to re-release an article entitled &#8216;Blogging: It’s Good for You&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PsychCentral has a wonderful bit of detective work showing the Scientific American just replaced &#8216;writing&#8217; with &#8216;blogging&#8217; to re-release an article entitled &#8216;Blogging: It’s Good for You&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M. Grohol, Psy.D.</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-515703</link>
		<dc:creator>John M. Grohol, Psy.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-515703</guid>
		<description>I know magazines and websites and such have to make their headlines &quot;sexy&quot; in order to attract an audience. But in this case, it just seems like the article was reaching to tie anything done in the research world to blogging itself. It would have held far more credibility for me had they reference actual blogging studies that showed what the article purported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know magazines and websites and such have to make their headlines &#8220;sexy&#8221; in order to attract an audience. But in this case, it just seems like the article was reaching to tie anything done in the research world to blogging itself. It would have held far more credibility for me had they reference actual blogging studies that showed what the article purported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Scientific American: Let’s Stretch Research to Make it Sexy!</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-515299</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Scientific American: Let’s Stretch Research to Make it Sexy!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-515299</guid>
		<description>[...] [Technorati] Tag results for behavior health wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt You’d think that Scientific American would be the last publication on Earth where its editors would stretch an article or its headlines to suggest findings not actually found in the research. And if you’re a regular reader of World of Psychology, you’d know you’d be wrong. Scientific American recently published an article entitled, Blogging: It’s Good for You. In such an article, you’d expect an article to reference research on blogging, no? Well, not surprising, the article had no such refe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Technorati] Tag results for behavior health wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerpt You’d think that Scientific American would be the last publication on Earth where its editors would stretch an article or its headlines to suggest findings not actually found in the research. And if you’re a regular reader of World of Psychology, you’d know you’d be wrong. Scientific American recently published an article entitled, Blogging: It’s Good for You. In such an article, you’d expect an article to reference research on blogging, no? Well, not surprising, the article had no such refe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-515278</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-515278</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I recently posted on a similar issue regarding an article I read from Medical News Today.  They noted food was not linked to ADHD in the headline, but in the body of the article, they discussed how food was not linked to hyperactivity.  I simply noted how I was confused, as the writers seemed to be using hyperactivity and ADHD interchangeably.  In this case, I&#039;m not so sure it was for page hits (though it might have been), as much as a lack of knowledge about what each term actually encompasses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I recently posted on a similar issue regarding an article I read from Medical News Today.  They noted food was not linked to ADHD in the headline, but in the body of the article, they discussed how food was not linked to hyperactivity.  I simply noted how I was confused, as the writers seemed to be using hyperactivity and ADHD interchangeably.  In this case, I&#8217;m not so sure it was for page hits (though it might have been), as much as a lack of knowledge about what each term actually encompasses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientific American: Let’s Stretch Research to Make it Sexy!</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-515173</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientific American: Let’s Stretch Research to Make it Sexy!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-515173</guid>
		<description>[...] lhgould wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe one research study the article references is “Implementing an Expressive Writing Study in a Cancer Clinic.” It does not involve blogging. Half of the people who participated in the research dropped out before the researchers could &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lhgould wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe one research study the article references is “Implementing an Expressive Writing Study in a Cancer Clinic.” It does not involve blogging. Half of the people who participated in the research dropped out before the researchers could &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seaneen</title>
		<link>http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/06/09/scientific-american-lets-stretch-research-to-make-it-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-515156</link>
		<dc:creator>Seaneen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychcentral.com/blog/?p=2164#comment-515156</guid>
		<description>Hello!

Sorry to be off-topic, but could you change my &quot;pole to polar&quot; link on Well Read to &quot;The Secret Life of a Manic Depressive&quot;?

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>Sorry to be off-topic, but could you change my &#8220;pole to polar&#8221; link on Well Read to &#8220;The Secret Life of a Manic Depressive&#8221;?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/12 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 367/367 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: g.psychcentral.com

Served from: psychcentral.com @ 2012-05-25 23:59:53 -->
