After being in a 9-month “under review” limbo, HealthyPlace’s HONcode accreditation was revoked last month by the Health on the Net Foundation for multiple violations of the HONcode over time. The HONcode principles are a set of voluntary guidelines that suggest areas of transparency and information for medical and health oriented websites.
Here’s an example of sponsored content on HealthyPlace, with no messaging making transparent that the content was written and provided entirely by the pharmaceutical company who makes the medication (among other problems, it also lacks an author and a date of last review). (You’ll also notice this is a page which still sports the claim that they comply with the HONcode at the bottom.)
As a big resource for mental health stuff online, HealthyPlace is visited by a lot of people each month. We therefore hope to see HealthyPlace bring its content back up to the standards they once espoused and to see them once again adhere to the HONcode principles.
This entry was posted on Saturday, April 12th, 2008 at 9:47 am and is filed under General, Policy and Advocacy, Technology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “HealthyPlace Loses Accreditation” (Pingbacks/trackbacks not shown below)
It’s also very poorly written. You would think they would bother to hire a professional writer if they’re going to display advertising copy disguised as neutral information. Then again, it’s a poor disguise — it seems obvious that it is an advertisement for Lexapro. Neutral sites don’t spell it in all caps, for one thing.
Be a Part of the Conversation! Comment on this Entry Now:
It’s also very poorly written. You would think they would bother to hire a professional writer if they’re going to display advertising copy disguised as neutral information. Then again, it’s a poor disguise — it seems obvious that it is an advertisement for Lexapro. Neutral sites don’t spell it in all caps, for one thing.




(4 votes, average: 4 out of 5)