World of Psychology

The Agony of Defeat

By John M Grohol PsyD
February 4, 2008

As a New England fan, I watched in horror as our team couldn’t keep the Patriots’ quarterback Tom Brady defended during last night’s game, resulting in a fairly humiliating defeat in Super Bowl 42. Two touchdowns? Wow. Definitely cringe-worthy. The Patriots’ defense played very well, keeping pressure on the Giants and their quarterback, Eli Manning, throughout. But it just wasn’t enough without their powerhouse offense to back them up.

The New York Giants, on the other hand, played a superior game, always keeping the pressure up, and driving down the field when they needed to. Their players made some outstanding, Super Bowl plays. Their defense was relentless. In the end, they wanted it more and deserved the win.

Still, it brings us to an end of an amazing season for the New England Patriots. To go undefeated during the regular season (and some of those games were nail-biters too, so it wasn’t like it was easy) is something still to be proud of.

Which brings me to the question of the day… Why do I feel such a connection with my football team this morning, even after their loss? Do fans of sports teams identify with their teams more after an amazing win or traumatic loss?

Yes, according to Platow et. al. (1999), who examined the rate and amount of donations to charity workers before and after a game, who stood outside a stadium and identified as supporters of either team, or neither team:

In addition, charity workers identified with either team received a higher frequency of contributions from fans of both teams together after the game relative to before; this pattern was reversed among charity workers not identified with a team. This unexpected finding suggests an increased salience of a general sport-fan identification after the game relative to before.

Finally, fans of winning teams in particular contributed more to any charity worker after the game than before, but this pattern was reversed among fans of losing teams.

Watching a game with your team playing appears to bring you to more closely identify with that team — you feel their win or loss more acutely. If you didn’t watch the game, you probably would feel no closer to the team. The key appears to be in actually watching the game.

Naturally, when your team has won, we’d expect you to feel more generous, which is what the researchers also found.

So please forgive me for mourning the Patriots’ loss today — the research shows that I’m likely to feel a closer connection with my team. After 18 weeks of watching them go so far, it was disappointing to see them not be able to pull off one last win last night.

Reference

Platow, M. J. et. al. (1999). The Contribution of Sport Fan Social Identity to the Production of Prosocial Behavior. Group Dynamics, 3(2), 161-169.


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Comments to
“The Agony of Defeat”

Yeah, I’m still not over the Packers not having been in the Super Bowl (or the fact that Brady et al. overshadowed what SHOULD have been an MVP season for Favre and coach of the year for McCarthy). I’m not sure it matters whether I watch the games or not, I still feel it — but most football teams probably are not the cultural phenomena to their towns/states that the Packers are.

I don’t know… I think you might be surprised how loyal and enthusiastic football (and other sports teams) fans are in their local regions. Look at college football, for instance.

A rough season for many teams. Here’s to looking next year! :)

As a diehard patriots fan and counselor, I am trying to reframe the loss….not easy…a real heartbreak….the pats had a great season with many magical moments and memories…a bittersweet season for all the teams that don’t win the superbowl

Best wishes
barry

I felt physically ill at the end of the Super Bowl. It was a big disappointment. And then I remembered: 11 days until Spring Training!

Go Red Sox!

Joan

Apropos of Dr. Grohol’s interesting piece:

It’s Not “Only a Game”

Ronald Pies MD

I am neither an athlete nor a big sports fan, but I know a bit about humiliation on the playing field. In high school, I actually managed to score a touchdown for the opposite team, by running the football across the wrong goal line. In twenty-five years, the coach had never witnessed this. In my nightmares, I can still see my teammates’ horror-struck faces. And so, in the wake of the Patriots’ traumatic loss in the Superbowl, I can feel a little of Patriot Nation’s pain.

The conventional and mainly useless anodyne for the fans of losing teams is, “It’s only a game.” The correct response—ideally, instead of slugging the well-meaning philosopher—is, “No, actually it’s not only a game. It’s part of me, lying face down on that football field.”

Sports physiologists and psychologists have known for some time that high-stakes games have profound physical and emotional effects on fans. David Edwards and colleagues at Emory University have shown that varsity soccer games can increase levels of the stress hormone, cortisol, and the sex hormone, testosterone, in both men and women. (Some might wonder if “testosterone poisoning” is part of the problem, when soccer fans become rowdy and violent). And a recent German study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that viewing a stressful soccer match more than doubles the risk of an “acute cardiovascular event”, including heart attacks and angina. There is no reason to suppose that American-style football is free of such risks, as some Patriots fans might confirm.

But there is a psychological piece of the puzzle, too. We all know that sports fans form strong emotional bonds to their favorite teams. But this form of “identification” can be a blessing or a curse, as Patriots (and Red Sox) fans well know. Research in the 1970s by psychologist Robert Cialdini showed that college students were more likely to use the pronoun “we” after the home team had won than when their team had lost. Cialdini’s work formed the basis for later research by psychologist Christian End, of Xavier University, on two phenomena called BIRG and CORF. BIRG–”basking in reflected glory”—is what many sports fans do when their team wins: the hats, T-shirts and painted faces all advertise the person’s identification with the winning team. The flip-side is CORF–”cutting off reflected failure,” or distancing oneself from a team that is losing. We often see CORF in the “fair-weather” fans who start talking about their team as “they”, rather than “we”, as the team begins to flame out. According to End, each of these unconscious strategies is a way of maintaining our self-esteem. Put another way, when Tom Brady completes that winning touchdown pass, Patriots fans raise their arms in triumph. When Brady gets sacked, there is a part of every fan that feels the body-blow. In the aftermath of the Patriot’s stunning Super Bowl loss, it’s not surprising that many Patriot fans find themselves face down in the dirt, emotionally speaking.

How long do these traumatic effects last? There seems to be very little solid research on this issue. My reading of sports websites suggests that for many lifelong fans, traumatic memories of “losing the big one” reverberate for years, or even decades. (Even a sports wimp like me can still remember the ball rolling through Bill Buckner’s legs, in the 1986 World Series). What can we do to avoid going into an emotional tailspin, after a major loss by the home team? How can we help our patients who may be so affected? If you can believe that “it’s only a game,” good for you. But most die-hard sports fans will not be helped by such counsel.

Sports psychologist Dr. Alan Goldberg suggests a different road to recovery. He argues on his website that, “The most successful people in and out of sports do two things differently than everyone else. First, they are more willing to take risks and therefore fail more frequently. Second, they use their failures in a positive way as a source of motivation and feedback to improve.” You can bet that, in time, the Patriots will do exactly that—honing their game for the next season by using their Super Bowl loss as a beneficial kick in the pants. Fans are left to recuperate in more indirect ways—maybe by becoming even better fans. For example, after a few understandable days of licking their wounds and crying in their beer, Patriots fans might consider supporting the New England Patriots Charitable Foundation. According to the Patriots’ website, the primary goal of the Foundation is “…to support programs that aid the youth and families of the New England region by assisting charities that foster cultural diversity, education, family and health.” That sounds like a no-lose proposition to me, and it is better than moping around the house over what might have been. In short, it’s not only a game–it’s an opportunity for some personal growth.

One huge question: why does my “Aunt” get physically sick (throwing up) after a college footbal loss? And my “Uncle” toss the just made home-video in the fireplace to burn? Are they not sick in a deeper fashion than the bathroom kind? I am likely to lose this webpage and not hear the answer should anyone offer it. Please give me something here! I worry about their kids!

Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:


(Required, will be published)

(Required, but will not be published)

(Optional)


    Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 4 Feb 2008

 


Recent Comments
  • FU.: After you find out how high is up,what’s beyond that?
  • Nepal Expedition: Great list i am agree with this pages
  • GeneB: Dr. Grohol, I’d be interested in finding any information on the “cyber life” of one who is...
  • jose pluma: does size matter?
  • bonnie: I dont know if any of you watch Glee. Well, it is not a deep show, but in the last episode I actually got...
Article Tools
Bookmark
Print
Email Friend


Stumble It!


Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter


Users Online: 698
Join Us Now!




Follow us on Twitter!

Find us on Facebook!