World of Psychology

Fighting for Care When a Drug Trial Goes Wrong

By John M. Grohol, PsyD
Founder & Editor-in-Chief

It is both sad and depressing to write about a drug company not living up to its promises, whether they were spelled out in explicit detail in legal documents or in language that to any layperson is eminently clear in its intent.

So when a pharmaceutical company, testing a new drug looking for FDA approval, says something like:

“If because of your participation in the study you require additional care that would not ordinarily be necessary for your condition, this will be provided at no additional cost to you.”

That seems pretty clear — if our drug screws you up, we’ll pay to make things as right as medical science allows. You won’t have to worry about any medical bills — we’ll take care of it.

And if you thought any of that, apparently you’d be sadly mistaken, according to this article in The Wall Street Journal, When Drug Trials Go Wrong, Patients Have Little Recourse.

By September 2005, eight months after the surgery, Ms. Davenport required constant monitoring. The family decided to put her in a nursing home outside Seattle, near Ms. Languille’s home. There, Ms. Davenport lost her balance and fell a few times. The nurses put her in lap restraints to keep her from getting out of her wheelchair.

Ms. Davenport’s neurologist, John Roberts of Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle, says he believes Spheramine caused her sudden decline. Dr. Roberts was not involved in the trial, but learned from a UCLA neurologist in early 2006 that Ms. Davenport was among the patients who had received the drug.

The family had to resort to suing the company for $5 million (calculating the lifetime medical costs Ms. Davenport is likely to incur), because the company kept dragging its feet on paying for Ms. Davenport’s medical bills. The family has already paid tens of thousands of dollars in medical costs related to her care, out of their own pocket. Hundreds of thousands wait in the years to come if they hadn’t sued. The company says they are now “close to a settlement.”

But for every story we read about in a newspaper, there are dozens of others who are going through similar circumstances, without an end in sight.

Companies need to learn to do the right thing, because it’s the right thing. They shouldn’t be shamed into having to do the right thing because of newspaper articles or media attention.


Comments


View Comments / Leave a Comment

This post currently has one comment. You can read the comments or leave your own thoughts on our new comments page.

Trackbacks

No trackbacks yet to this post.


    Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 31 Jan 2008
    Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.

APA Reference
Grohol, J. (2008). Fighting for Care When a Drug Trial Goes Wrong. Psych Central. Retrieved on May 26, 2012, from http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/02/01/fighting-for-care-when-a-drug-trial-goes-wrong/

 

Recent Comments
  • anonymus: As someone with this disorder, prevention could have saved me so much heart ache. Poor relationships, years...
  • hart: Alisa, Counseling is the best way I’ve found. Having a caring network of friends is important as well,...
  • carl: Samuel I trust that you did not perceive my response as a threat or as a contradictory statement even at the...
  • Joel Hassman, MD: Oh, and by the way, Dr Pies, here is another retort to your demand people use their real names at...
  • CandidFrank65: Interesting article. I have been living in Trinidad since 1965. The fact is that East Indians are much...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter



Find a Therapist


Users Online: 1
Join Us Now!