In the “if they experience what I go through, perhaps they’ll have more empathy for people who have to deal with these illnesses” category, Philip wants Chief Justice John Roberts medicated, stat. I can certainly understand that sentiment, since once you’ve been on a psychiatric medication (some of which are also used to treat epilepsy), it’s an experience you’ll never forget. In fact, all mental health professionals should be required to try at least one psychiatric medication in their training — it’s no aspirin.
I suspect, though, that most U.S. Supreme Court justices have been on some pretty heavy meds from time to time, especially as they age. It’s fairly common for older citizens to be on at least one medication for any of a number of maladies (e.g., arthritis, heart disease, joint pain, skin problems, urinary tract issues, etc.). Sure, maybe not as extreme as epilepsy and the medications used to treat it, but I doubt there’s any lack of understanding of the many side effects of medications.
The real problem is that U.S. Supreme Court justices, like any member of Congress or the Executive branch, pays minimally ($35/month) for its own virtually-unlimited healthcare benefits, including unlimited doctor visits, zero deductibles and no co-pays. Have these judges and politicians get “regular” healthcare in the U.S. and experience what the rest of have to deal with in just even getting and paying for a prescribed medication. It can be a truly frustrating, horrid, and expensive experience.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Links to This Article
University Update - Supreme Court - On Seizures and Medications (8/1/2007)
On Seizures and Medications — Diet Loosing Weight (4/1/2008)
0 Comments to
“On Seizures and Medications”
Join the Conversation! Post a Comment:
Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 1 Aug 2007






